2010-10-07 JRA1 Task Leader TelCon

Europe/Zurich
n/a (n/a)

n/a

n/a

Morris Riedel
Description
Minutes are available and attached. Slides about development and test plan are attached.
Slides

Thursday
2010-10-07
11:00 a.m. - 12:30 a.m.

Participants:
- Morris
- John White
- Patrick
- Andre
- Marco
- Andrea

Some more information:


(1)
Screen-sharing tool:

http://webconf.vc.dfn.de/jsc/
 
No login is required. Just enter as 'guest' with your real world name.

 

(2)
Use of mailmagnes skype buddy.

Please add this buddy to your list of skype friends and call it.

It is basically a skype-based telcon facility.

 

(3)
Agenda:


(a)
Updates from PEB/PTB/ECB

Public Minutes:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/WebHome

PEB Minutes:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/EmiPEBPublic

PEB Deliverable
- we require first an internal review
- then external review
- default settings: Francesco (SA1), Alberto (SA2)
- PO does the review contact & tracking, etc. (not area leaders)

PTB -> Overall Workplan
- https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/DeliverableDNA131
- in-sync with technical area


PTB -> SAGA Affair

- PT created

- arclibclients
- infosites
- SAGA-RD PT
- PTB Ad-hoc Balazs, Tuesday morning - 1 hour, discussed,

-- (Balazs in NorduGrid Workshop)

- Minutes of extraordinary PTB meeting and decisions online:

http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=109228

 


PTB F2F CERN
- Clarification: overall architectural roadmap, but not concrete development plans
- JRA1: concrete development plans --> (c) - end of October

Questions:
- how does this related with the software release plan

- software release plan --> produced by SA1 (Christina)
-- timeline, releases
-- overlap!
-- Andrea - which component in which release EMI-1

TBD Morris : to get in touch with Christina, release manager (DSA2.1) - get JRA1 Leaders in the loop


(b)
Short updates of JRA1 Tasks & Debrief Deliverable Status

Done: Compute - In Review (Marco)
Review by Michel Drescher (TM of EGI)
Others pending still
Waiting for all reviews to arrive

Done: Data - In Review (Patrick)
Review not done yet
others pending still

Not fully Done: Infrastructure....Postpone
Status: Done, but PO wants us to integrate the latest-greatest messaging statements, EMI-O, EMI-1 no messaging components, prototype work
Laurence integrating this

Done: Security: Security in review
- internal review
- then external one


Basically Done: Standardization
- Update SIENA initiative - common standardization, EMI contributes,
- available on the wiki page
- finally agreed on Friday
- https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/EMI/EMIJRA1T6DJRA151/2010-10-06_EMI_DJRA1.5.1_v2.doc
- TBD ALL : recommendation to look at the executive summary of the standardization deliverable


In Progress: Integration and Interoperability Deliverable
- some sections ready
- matrices filled with information
- final draft next week


In Progress: Quality Control
- quality is important - it takes time
- Andrea: final draft thisweek ok
- start the internal JRA1 review, fine, 80%


(c)
Earlier discussed:
Previous material collected
- Patrick (Data) -> Done
- Laurence (Information) -> Done
- Massimo (Compute) -> Done
- John (Security) -> similiar like Laurence

Observation: Difficult to get information out of the PT teams.

Postpone to (c)


Continuation of the JRA1 development plans & Task lists for EMI-1 as a high priority in JRA1 (ECB input!)

First four technical areas, then cross concerns and standardization/integration plans

Second, test plans and quality control aspects in context.

Third, how we progress significantly with this - perhaps mostly using e-mail & phone calls

Goal: Development plans ready by end of October as discussed in Amsterdam.


TBD Morris : Upload slides

TBD Morris : Test plan discussion with Andrea 

(d)
Possible preparations for EMI Arch F2F at CERN

- Apart from send input for development plan ok

(e)
Patrick: Maybe a milestone would be late

- Informed Florida


(f)
bi-weekly JRA1 conference unless some urgent topic (e.g. development plan if we see we have no progress)
- not everybody always present due to conferences (that's life and can't be really changes)

- over time participation is important, missing one meeting is not a problem


(g)
AOB

- nothing

 

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.
The agenda of this meeting is empty