<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<event>
<ID>102998</ID>
<category>Conferences</category>
<parentProtection>false</parentProtection>
<materialList>[["slides", "FirstConvenersMeeting"], ["minutes", "Minutes"], ["notes", "Notes"], ["paper", "Paper"], ["poster", "Poster"], ["0", "SecondConvenersMeeting"], ["summary", "Summary"]]</materialList>
<announcer>
 <user>
  <title></title>
  <name first="Marcel" middle="" last="Demarteau"></name>
  <organization>Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (US)</organization>
  <email>marcel.demarteau@cern.ch</email>
  <userid>7308</userid>
 </user>
</announcer>
<keywords>
 <keyword>Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics 2011</keyword>
 <keyword>TIPP 2011</keyword>
 <keyword>TIPP11</keyword>
</keywords>
<title>TIPP 2011  - 2nd International Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
	The Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics 2011 (TIPP 2011) conference is the second in the new series of international conferences in the field of particle physics sponsored by IUPAP. The program focuses on all areas of detector development and instrumentation in particle physics, astro-particle physics and closely related fields.&lt;/p&gt;
Here is a rough general guideline: for the existing experiments/projects (running, under construction, or in the plan, or large R&amp;amp;D projects),&amp;nbsp;we are soliciting two types of talks. One type is the overview talk (~25+5 min) for each experiment/project, the&amp;nbsp;other type is more elaborate/focused/short talks on sub-detectors (15+5 mins).&amp;nbsp; For individual smaller scale&amp;nbsp;(R&amp;amp;D) work, one abstract/talk should be good enough (length somewhat flexible, typically short).&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The areas covered by the parallel tracks are categorized as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "&gt;
	&lt;div class="indented" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 10px; clear: both; "&gt;
		&lt;div&gt;
			Experimental detector systems&lt;/div&gt;
		Gaseous detectors&lt;br /&gt;
		Semiconductor detectors&lt;br /&gt;
		Calorimeters&lt;br /&gt;
		Particle identification&lt;br /&gt;
		Photon detectors&lt;br /&gt;
		Dark Matter Detectors&lt;br /&gt;
		Neutrino Detectors&lt;br /&gt;
		Astrophysics and space instrumentation&lt;br /&gt;
		Front-end electronics&lt;br /&gt;
		Trigger and data acquisition systems&lt;br /&gt;
		Machine Detector Interface and beam instrumentation&lt;br /&gt;
		Instrumentation for medical, biological and materials research&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		Since this is a science driven cross-disciplinary conference on Technology and Instrumentation, the overview talks from each experiment should not be the usual &amp;quot;beauty contest&amp;quot; type of presentations shown at typical physics or hardware conferences. The overview talk for a given experiment should start from science motivations, then focus on the challenges in technology and instrumentation, and how the experiment/project overcame the challenges, the experience of designing and building such systems and lessons learned. What would especially be good to hear is not only what the challenges&lt;font class="Apple-style-span" color="#444444"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;were, but what challenges they are still struggling to overcome! This conference is not for polished talks about all that is beautiful and works well.&amp;nbsp;We&amp;#39;d like to hear what the limitations are of the current experiments and how it limits the science and focus on ideas on how to break these barriers.&amp;nbsp;The overview talks could reference/advertise the shorter (more focused) talks from the same experiment. One could think of the overview talks as &amp;quot;mini-plenary&amp;quot; talks (one per experiment/project).&amp;nbsp;In some cases, especially large sub-detectors, it is also possible to consider an overview talk (with a few abstracts on the details).&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
<participants></participants>
<closed>False</closed>
<location>
 <name>Chicago </name>
 <address>301 East Water Street Chicago, IL 60611</address>
 <room>Sheraton Hotel</room>
</location>
<startDate>2011-06-08T08:00:00</startDate>
<endDate>2011-06-14T19:15:00</endDate>
<creationDate>2010-08-01T09:11:00</creationDate>
<modificationDate>2012-03-01T11:04:01</modificationDate>
<timezone>US/Central</timezone>
<chair>
 <user>
  <title>Dr.</title>
  <name first="Marcel" middle="" last="Demarteau"></name>
  <organization>ANL</organization>
  <email>demarteau@anl.gov</email>
 </user>
 <user>
  <title>Dr.</title>
  <name first="Tiehui Ted" middle="" last="Liu"></name>
  <organization>Fermilab</organization>
  <email>thliu@fnal.gov</email>
 </user>
</chair>
<contribution color="#00CCFF" textcolor="#0D1E1F">
 <ID>116</ID>
 <parentProtection>false</parentProtection>
 <materialList>[["slides", "FirstConvenersMeeting"], ["minutes", "Minutes"], ["notes", "Notes"], ["paper", "Paper"], ["poster", "Poster"], ["0", "SecondConvenersMeeting"], ["summary", "Summary"]]</materialList>
 <track>Instrumentation for Medical, Biological and Materials Research</track>
 <type>
  <id>0</id>
  <name>Oral Presentation</name>
 </type>
 <title>Study of TOF PET using Cherenkov Light</title>
 <speakers>
  <user>
   <title>Prof.</title>
   <name first="Samo" middle="" last="Korpar"></name>
   <organization>J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, and University of Maribor</organization>
   <email>samo.korpar@ijs.si</email>
  </user>
 </speakers>
 <primaryAuthors>
  <user>
   <title>Prof.</title>
   <name first="Samo" middle="" last="Korpar"></name>
   <organization>J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, and University of Maribor</organization>
   <email>samo.korpar@ijs.si</email>
  </user>
 </primaryAuthors>
 <location>
  <name>Sheraton Hotel</name>
  <address>None</address>
  <room>Huron</room>
 </location>
 <startDate>2011-06-09T16:20:00</startDate>
 <endDate>2011-06-09T16:40:00</endDate>
 <duration>00:20</duration>
 <abstract>This work investigates the possibilities of improving the measurements of arrival time difference of the two 511 keV photons arising from annihilation of a positron in positron emission tomography (PET). The new technique of detecting the prompt Cherenkov light, produced by absorption of the annihilation photon in a suitable crystal, could considerably improve the image quality. A simple apparatus with PbF2 crystals and microchannel plate photomultipliers (MCP PMTs) has been constructed and coincidence resolutions of 71 ps FWHM and 95 ps FWHM have been achieved with 5 mm and 15 mm thick crystals respectively. Simulation
calculations are in agreement with the experimental findings.

In the contribution, we will first describe the principles of the detection method and present the experimental apparatus. We will then discuss the results of measurements of time resolution for two coincident 511 keV gamma photons absorbed in PbF2 crystals. Finally, we will compare our measurements with simulation calculations, which also included a study with PbWO4 crystals in order to investigate possible improvements of the design.</abstract>
 <material>
  <ID>slides</ID>
  <title>Slides</title>
  <description></description>
  <type></type>
  <files>
  </files>
  <types>
   <type>
    <name>doc</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/word.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>word file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>ppt</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/powerpoint.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>powerpoint file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>pdf</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/pdf_small.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>pdf file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>odt</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/writer.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>writer file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>odp</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/impress.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>presentation file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>ods</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/calc.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>spreadsheet file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>other</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/file_small.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>unknown type file</imgAlt>
   </type>
   <type>
    <name>link</name>
    <imgURL>http://indico.cern.ch/images/link.png</imgURL>
    <imgAlt>link</imgAlt>
   </type>
  </types>
 </material>
</contribution>
<plugins>
 <collaboration>
<!-- Needed for timezone awareness -->
  <todayReference>2013-05-25</todayReference>
  <tomorrowReference>2013-05-26</tomorrowReference>
 </collaboration>
</plugins>
</event>
