(how do they appear to the rest of the world? as single
sites with a CE and SE?)
08:40
→
09:10
Storage element30m
Status of the virtual Storage Element that presents NDGF as a single site for storage management and data access
Analysis of the internal data rates within the NDGF Tier-1
(some concern that these may be higher than currently assumed)
Operation of the File Transfer Service for communication with other Tier-1s (ATLAS) and other Tier-2s (potentially for ATLAS, definitely for CMS if NDGF is a CMS Tier-1)
Implementation of the ATLAS data placement model
(RAW data and all its derivatives at the same site)
Implementation of the base SRM functionality (SRM v 2.2) and storage classes
Provision of a catalog equivalent to LFC for ATLAS
09:10
→
09:20
Progress and plans for the distributed database service for ATLAS in NDGF10m
(3D project)
09:20
→
09:30
Provision of site availability metrics10m
09:30
→
09:40
Model for NDGF daily operation and integration with the LCG/EGEE grid operations services10m
09:40
→
09:50
Accounting plans10m
see accounting presentations at the GDB (06dec06,
09jan07) and the discussions and decisions at the MB
(19dec06, 08jan07)
Integration of cpu accounting with the APEL repository at the GOC
User-level accounting
Storage accounting
09:50
→
10:00
Implementation of scheduling priorities based on VOMS groups and roles10m
10:00
→
10:10
Installation schedule for 200710m
10:10
→
10:40
Status and plans for testing the distributed Tier-1 functionality and integrating into the ATLAS and ALICE services30m
10:40
→
10:50
Organisational and management issues10m
Is it clear now how CMS fits in to NDGF, organisationally and technically?
Formal resource commitments for the Nordic countries and signing the MoU
NDGF representation in the WLCG Overview Board, and Computing Resource Review Board
Does NDGF feel adequately represented in the various WLCG boards, committees and meetings, and does it feel that it is well enough informed about the activity of the project?
