CERN-NDGF Meeting
-
-
08:30
→
08:40
Architecture of the Tier-2s within NDGF 10m(how do they appear to the rest of the world? as single sites with a CE and SE?)
-
08:40
→
09:10
Storage element 30m
-
Status of the virtual Storage Element that presents NDGF as a single site for storage management and data access
-
Analysis of the internal data rates within the NDGF Tier-1(some concern that these may be higher than currently assumed)
-
Operation of the File Transfer Service for communication with other Tier-1s (ATLAS) and other Tier-2s (potentially for ATLAS, definitely for CMS if NDGF is a CMS Tier-1)
-
Implementation of the ATLAS data placement model(RAW data and all its derivatives at the same site)
-
Implementation of the base SRM functionality (SRM v 2.2) and storage classes
-
Provision of a catalog equivalent to LFC for ATLAS
-
-
09:10
→
09:20
Progress and plans for the distributed database service for ATLAS in NDGF 10m(3D project)
-
09:20
→
09:30
Provision of site availability metrics 10m
-
09:30
→
09:40
Model for NDGF daily operation and integration with the LCG/EGEE grid operations services 10m
-
09:40
→
09:50
Accounting plans 10msee accounting presentations at the GDB (06dec06, 09jan07) and the discussions and decisions at the MB (19dec06, 08jan07)
-
Integration of cpu accounting with the APEL repository at the GOC
-
User-level accounting
-
Storage accounting
-
-
09:50
→
10:00
Implementation of scheduling priorities based on VOMS groups and roles 10m
-
10:00
→
10:10
Installation schedule for 2007 10m
-
10:10
→
10:40
Status and plans for testing the distributed Tier-1 functionality and integrating into the ATLAS and ALICE services 30m
-
10:40
→
10:50
Organisational and management issues 10m
-
Is it clear now how CMS fits in to NDGF, organisationally and technically?
-
Formal resource commitments for the Nordic countries and signing the MoU
-
NDGF representation in the WLCG Overview Board, and Computing Resource Review Board
-
Does NDGF feel adequately represented in the various WLCG boards, committees and meetings, and does it feel that it is well enough informed about the activity of the project?
-
-
10:50
→
11:00
Conclusion and next steps 10m
-
08:30
→
08:40