24–28 Oct 2022
University of Santiago de Compostela
Europe/Madrid timezone

In-beam γ-ray spectroscopy of $^{94}$Ag

26 Oct 2022, 17:55
15m
Classroom 6, Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación (University of Santiago de Compostela)

Classroom 6, Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación

University of Santiago de Compostela

Campus Norte, Av. de Castelao, s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Oral Contribution P2 Nuclear Structure, Spectroscopy, and Dynamics P2 Nuclear Structure, Spectroscopy, and Dynamics

Speaker

Xesus Pereira-Lopez (Center for Exotic Nuclear Studies (CENS), Institute for Basic Science (IBS))

Description

The concept of isospin has been introduced to explain the apparent exchange symmetry between protons and neutrons. However, if the nuclear force were the same for neutrons and protons properties such as excitation energies and masses would depend only on the mass number A. Recent studies have shown that the Coulomb force cannot account for all deviations, suggesting that other isospin-symmetry-breaking components must be present. N∼Z systems present the perfect testing ground to probe isospin symmetry phenomena [1-3]. In particular, pairing correlations have a significant importance in the description of the nuclear structure of N=Z nuclei, where neutrons and protons are arranged occupying the same orbits, allowing T=0 np pairing in addition to the normal T=1. It was recently suggested that spin-aligned T=0 np pairs dominate the wavefunction of the y-rast sequence in $^{92}$Pd [4]. Subsequent theoretical studies were devoted to probe the contribution of np pairs in other N=Z A>90 nuclei [5-6], suggesting that a similar pairing scheme strongly influences the structure of these nuclei. In an effort to answer this question further, a recoil beta tagging experiment has been performed to try and identify the excited T=0 and T=1 states in odd-odd N=Z $^{94}$Ag via the $^{40}$Ca($^{58}$Ni,p3n)$^{94}$Ag reaction using MARA recoil separator and JUROGAM3 array at the Accelerator Laboratory of the University of Jyväskylä.
The detailed goals of the experiment, the setup, tentatively identified transitions, experimental CED and nuclear shell model predictions will be shown in this presentation. A preliminary interpretation of the experimental results will also be discussed.

References
[1] K. Wimmer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 072501.
[2] R.D.O. Llewellyn et al., Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135873.
[3] A. Boso et al., Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134835.
[4] B. Cederwall et al., Nature 469 (2011) 6871.
[5] G.J. Fu et al., Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) 072501.
[6] Z.X. Xu et al., Nucl. Phys. A 877 (2012) 51-58.

Primary authors

Prof. Michael Bentley (University of York) Prof. Robert Wadsworth (University of York) Xesus Pereira-Lopez (Center for Exotic Nuclear Studies (CENS), Institute for Basic Science (IBS))

Presentation materials