04:01:42 Brian Shuve (he/him): It is possible to get H -> 2 HNL if there exists a U(1)_B-L breaking scalar that gives mass to the HNLs 04:02:56 Miha's iPhone (2): Also LR https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06834 04:04:27 Suchita Kulkarni: I absolutely agree that h-> HNL HNL are possible in non-minimal extensions. I was thinking about minimal extension scenarios. Sorry I was unclear 04:05:25 Suchita Kulkarni: also I originally thought about asking about 2 vs 3 body decays and then ultimately confused myself while asking the question 🙂 04:05:44 Brian Shuve (he/him): Got it - thanks! 04:06:26 Miha's iPhone (2): 🙂 04:07:50 José Zurita: I think the point here is just to recycle the HNL search and apply it to a light Higgs model (the light Higgs could decay invisibly into DM, or into other final states, whatever). But I was indeed wondering why the reinterpretation has not been done. Sure, if H-> HNL HNL is quite interesting as well. 04:08:36 José Zurita: I would guess that reinterpreting the signal for Higgs is not very sensitive, but maybe in some blind spot (low scalar masses) one can gain something? I honestly don't know. 04:08:44 Nishita Desai: Jose: For your S->dd question, I remember the paper dealing with S->bb separately because B hadrons are themselves long lived. 04:09:02 Nishita Desai: So dd channel is essentially "all light quarks” 04:09:04 José Zurita: Yes S->bb is different, but I thought we were tagging “d” quarks :-) 04:09:25 Nishita Desai: No "dd" is just “ordinary" displaced jets 04:09:57 Nishita Desai: whereas "bb" is “weirdly displaced" jets (characterisation is mine) 04:10:04 Suchita Kulkarni: for h -> N N in B-L let me take the opportunity to advertise https://inspirehep.net/literature/1667195. It doesn't reinterpret existing searches but has h-> HNL HNL for B-L. 04:10:33 Suchita Kulkarni: it is interesting to indeed think about reinterpretation in either cases.