Preliminary minutes for 37th TREX - Special VELO topic

Presented by Paula Collins - presentation available on Indico.

In case we stay with actual planning:

It is expected that the limited intensity of the machine during first weeks of the commissioning should not bring any important temperature load to the system.

No movements of the VELO are foreseen before the A-side installation (VELO nominal open position 29mm).

Within this scenario there are no major issues foreseen by impedance, machine protection, vacuum and LHC OP.

In case of an additional installation delay:

The beam intensity limits must be re-discussed and agreed by both machine and experiment. Connection of the TC monitoring on the A side will provide additional information however requires neon venting of the IP8.X, opening detector volume and pump-down of the IP8.X (intervention for at least 4 days). Additional neon venting is not preferred option by TE-VSC as it presents a risk and effects the vacuum conditions of the IP8.X. 

(1*) The increase of the temperature will likely impose a limit for the beam vacuum (pressure increase caused by excessive thermal outgassing may trigger sector valves interlock as well as increase saturation of NEG in the IP8.X and connected vacuum sectors). The limit proposed by the LHCb (80°C) measured on the C side (with active cooling) must be set as a function of beam vacuum pressure (agreed by TE-VSC).

Post meeting notes (JS):

Slide 12 - Temperatures during VELO warm-up (only C side of the VELO, SMOG2 readouts):

Preliminary geometrical study of the RF box aperture VS beam-screen of Q1 and smallest BP diameter attached to these minutes (pictures):

Preliminary minutes written by J. Sestak 19-20/4/2022.