00:43:58 Daniel S Katz: The IRIS-HEP Blueprint workshops are community events intended for presentations, networking and collaboration as well as learning. We value a civil and respectful environment which encourages the free expression and exchange of scientific ideas. All attendees are expected to adhere to the CERN Code of Conduct. If you believe someone is violating the Code of Conduct, we ask that you report it by emailing the workshop organizers responsible for reporting (matthew.feickert@cern.ch, sexton@fnal.gov). 00:44:33 Daniel S Katz: CERN CoC: https://hr.web.cern.ch/codeofconduct 00:50:19 Daniel S Katz: Reposting: The IRIS-HEP Blueprint workshops are community events intended for presentations, networking and collaboration as well as learning. We value a civil and respectful environment which encourages the free expression and exchange of scientific ideas. All attendees are expected to adhere to the CERN Code of Conduct: https://hr.web.cern.ch/codeofconduct If you believe someone is violating the Code of Conduct, we ask that you report it by emailing the workshop organizers responsible for reporting (matthew.feickert@cern.ch, sexton@fnal.gov). 01:10:01 Daniel S Katz: If anyone wants to have follow-up conversations on this, I'm @danielskatz@fosstodon.org (on mastodon) 01:12:56 Daniel S Katz: JOSS: https://joss.theoj.org 01:13:42 Sudhir Malik: Thanks for answer(s) 01:14:58 Mark Neubauer: Your welcome (and thanks for the followup from others!) 01:16:05 Matthew Feickert: Also JOSS is great, IMO. :) 01:16:31 Mark Neubauer: To answer Patricks question on format, you may notice that talk slots are padded with “lots” of discussion time (usually N’+M’ where N=M). So discussion (with time bounds!) is highly encouraged 01:18:01 Matthew Feickert: those wouldn't pass JOSS review, probably 01:32:31 Daniel S Katz: Can I make my comment from the doc? I don't know where this goes in the order of hands... 01:32:45 Graeme A Stewart: Yes - of course 01:32:48 Matthew Feickert: please dan 01:34:57 Matthew Feickert: who exactly complains about the citation number? The journals? 01:35:29 Eduardo Rodrigues: Can't beat the number of authors ;-). 01:35:58 Misha Mikhasenko: Nature Physics limits the number of citation to 100 01:36:17 Matt LeBlanc: But they do not all go to nature physics … 01:36:38 Jim Pivarski: I seem to remember PRL counting the citations in the page length (discounted somehow, cut still scales with a lower constant of proportionality). 01:38:10 Misha Mikhasenko: for references, https://www.nature.com/nphys/content article: up to 50 review: up to 100 01:38:40 Patrick Koppenburg: Nature physics also has a limit at 100, 01:39:01 Patrick Koppenburg: :) we say the same 01:39:03 Daniel S Katz: the reason for citation limits was once that this added pages (and paper cost money), but this is no longer a valid reason when publications are digital 01:41:56 Matthew Feickert: To make sure this gets posted in the chat as well on on Indico, the live notes for the workshop are here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AN-Kv59kkz3vyVLImeA3nehcyUfM2WEGnaCNBJRy7q4/edit?usp=sharing