Comments and questions during discussions

 

LC vision (Erik)

Comment from James: Two interaction poitns are crucial for the physics and detector community!

HALHF (Carl)

Q Eirik: Can you track (in the detector) a very asymmetric beam? Tracking is already difficult with a narrow cone.

Q Heidi: If the positron problem is solved (in plasma), would you still do an asymmetric collider?
A: Yes, the technology for electrons and positrons would anyway likely be different.

Q Ole: Could one use a circular machine for e+?
A: No, the time structure of a circular machine would be too different from the plasma linac.

Q James: What would be the time scale for building/operating this
A: 10-20 years?

Q Ionut: Are the optima sharp?
A: Not very sharp, and there is also uncertainity due to e.g. klystron pricing.

Comment Farid: Asymmetry might be good for analysis - e.g. secondary vertexes for tracking are "stretched out"

Comment Alex: Going straight to the highest energies would be very challenging
A: Indeed, want to work our way up

Applications (Steinar)

C Steinar to "FCC Accelerator oportunities": FCC injectors is something we could consider contributing to. Curently driven by PSI, who already has the expertise