Short summary:

• The proposed linking workflow is
• For now limited to the case where entries exist in EAM and AFT
• A 1:N mapping (1 logbook entry : N AFT entries) as this would also enable future integrations
• Links to different logbooks are allowed though in AFT
• EAM would own linking between the logbooks eventually, by setting both the EAMàAFT and AFTàEAM link
• It would check beforehand whether a link already exists and notify the user to change it
• AFT would grey out the option to link to EAM
• To guide the user, an adequate time window of AFT faults is suggested (either on date of creation or event date) and based on the logbook a set of AFT systems is suggested (e.g. CV logbook only suggests Cooling and Ventilation categories)
• A mapping of systems is attached. Note that it resolves all sub-systems, but normally only the top-level system is applicable for the filtering
• The AFT APIs are mostly ready for this (Anti shared the link with Ricardo). Proper authentication via service accounts has to be ensured, but should be no show-stopper.
• At the next EAM to AFT integration meeting the proposal is presented to the equipment groups/TIOC with a timeline proposal of having it ready during the YETS. Ricardo would be ok to prepare a little demo when given enough notice. If it is being agreed and no unexpected complexities arise, it may be test-able before the YETS.