A few notes/conclusions on the meeting of Feb 14:

Running at the Z-peak: we recommend to mention it as a "technical feasibility, not part of the CLIC baseline".

Background to this: Running at the Z-peak in a dedicated run (Lumi ~0.36*10^34 cm-2s-1) can be interesting for a number of SM parameters. However, running at the Z-peak with the 380 GeV machine will not give any significant improvement with respect to "LEP plus HL-LHC" data. However, yearly short runs at the Z-peak have some interest for calibration purposes (e.g. track-momentum scale). +/-80% longitudinal electron polarisation is available at the Z-pole for the modified collider.

First glance at how to use the 3 CLICdp pages in the CLIC submission:

• 1 page for Higgs couplings, including the plots for the couplings at 100 Hz and at the 3 energies for model dependent and independent (=> Philipp)
• 1 page for other physics subjects, e.g. HH, top physics and BSM (=> Aidan and Philipp)
• 1 page on update on experimental conditions with new accelerator parameters and on detector technologies (emphasising on a mature concept, many things already mature at previous strategy, recent progress on detector technologies). Dominik is writing a summary on detector technology progress (pixel/tracker); this will be compactified for the submission page, while the longer text will go in a CLICdp note or in an appexdix of the CLIC submission. Calo progress, mainly CMS HGCal based, will be added accordingly (Lucie/Eva). Comments on detector occupancies in preparation by Andre. TDAQ comments will follow (Dominik).

Next meetings:

24/2 at 16 hrs:   experimental conditions, dtector technology progress, etc

7/3 at 16 hrs:  physics