<p>Some of the open questions (for the 10-page document):</p>
<p>* Part of the document is in US English, part in UK English.</p>
<ul>
<li>Dominik: The document is not very explicit about the use/sharing of the 100 Hz among the 2 experiments. Can we state something more clear than just "sharing" or "in parallel". There is already a statement that the full 100 Hz can be sent to 1 expt (top of page 4), but the technical feasibility of sharing is not clear.</li>
<li>Do we still need to shorten the detector part?</li>
<li>In the section of the alignment is written: "
<p>A nm-level vibration stabilisation system for both main linac and final focus quadrupoles, which is</p>
<p>based on actuators and inertial sensors, allows decoupling of the focusing magnets from the ground. "  Is it OK to mention it in one phrase? The two systems are technically different and comply with different precision requirements.</p>
<p> </p>
</li>
<li>Top of page 6 "demonstrations" =&gt; "demonstrators"?</li>
<li>Proposal to upgrade or make a new varsion of this page https://clic.cern/european-strategy</li>
</ul>