Discussion of Inconsistent Simulation Results in Top-up Injection
Thursday 7 Aug 2025, 10:00
→
11:00
Europe/Zurich
10:00
→
10:20
Inconsistent Simulation Results
20m
Objectives: Reach coherent results before the presentation at FCC optics meeting
Top-up injection with only considering SR
Similar results between SAD and Xsuite (ABT), but evident different Xsuite simulation results between ABP (Xutil) and ABT
Horizontal emittance blow-up is observed in both SAD and Xsuite (ABT), but not in Xsuite (ABP)
Vertical emittance results looks fine
Longitudinal emittance difference?
Injection efficiency results
100 % with only considering the SR
slightly difference with considering the WS beambeam effects
Possible difference
Code tracking difference?
Tracking setting
Lattice generation methods (the version of July)
Beam Parameter
According to the
booster repo
, the bunch length of injected beam should be 2.4 mm ?
Beam distribution difference
Comparison between Sen and Xutil (Matched beam)
Comparison between Sen and SAD (Mismatched beam)
Emittance results comparison