<p>Miguel Niño</p>
<ul>
<li>Alberto: This analysis should be dominated by systematic uncertainties. It would be interesting to investigate potential sources of uncertainties (e.g., plot m_rec - m_true).</li>
<li>Maria: Would Delphes suffice for this analysis (or should we try to do a full simulation)? Alberto reply: vertex detector alignment are difficult to do with FastSim, among other problems. Michele: No clear procedure yet with FullSim —&gt; long-term project.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>Pablo</p>
<ul>
<li>Olcyr: Which assumptions enter the determination of two hadron FFs? Pablo: Pi-Pi rather leading FF clean; Other channels are more complicated at this moment.</li>
<li>Martin: Data-driven determinations can have better precision than lattice for HVP in certain regions. We should continue with both approaches.</li>
<li>Olcyr: QED corrections for tau-&gt;l P. What is the status of lattice QCD determinations? </li>
</ul>