From pxs@mppmu.mpg.de Wed May 30 17:45:35 2012
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:45:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Seyboth <pxs@mppmu.mpg.de>
To: Marek Kowalski <Marek.Kowalski@cern.ch>
Cc: Blume Christoph <blume@ikf.uni-frankfurt.de>, Gazdzicki Marek <Marek.Gazdzicki@cern.ch>, Stefanek Grzegorz <Grzegorz.Stefanek@pu.kielce.pl>, Stroebele Herbert <stroebele@ikf.uni-frankfurt.de>
Subject: Re: EC for paper on enrgy dependence of p,pbar production

Dear Marek,

Here are some general comments to the draft:

- experimental setup:
    mention the collimator in front of the veto calorimeter
    mention the scaling of the magnetic field strength with beam energy
      Both are required to keep approximately energy independent
      acceptance. For wording you can look in Herbert/Milica paper
    Fig.1: TOF-GL,TOF-GR should be removed, the big TOF walls should
      be named TOF-L, TOF-R. Perhapes you could use a layout from a
      recent paper.

- Figure 3:
    I would give an example both for positive and negative charge. The
    caption should mention the beam energy and the p,p_T bin

- feed-down correction on page 9: you should be more explicit about
    correcting the Venus yield. Scaling by the ratio of measured yields
    (or statistical model yields) and Venus simulated yields ?
    Differentially in y, p_T or global factor ?

- Figs.4,5: you should somehow indicate the rapidity intervals to
    which each distribution belongs

- Figs.6,7,8: use different markers for protons and antiprotons, as
    well as TOF and MIlica measurements. Measured points should be
    drawn as filled markers, reflected points as open markers

- fitting of the net baryon/net-proton distributions: please give
    explicitly the formula of the function and mention any constraints
    you imposed on the fits

Best regards,   Peter



On Tue, 22 May 2012, Marek Kowalski wrote:

> Gentlemen,
> Please, find the corrected version. I added Milica's and TOF point, following
> Herbert's suggestion. I also changed Ylab to Ycm, following suggestion from
> Peter. Also plots are a little bit nicer now. I hope it'll not create a
> problem for you. 30th of May for discussion is fine with me.
> Best regards, Marek
> On Saturday 19 of May 2012, Peter Seyboth wrote:
>> Dear Christoph, Marek, Grzegorz and Herbert,
>>
>> We would be very grateful if you could serve as the editorial
>> committee for Marek's new paper on the energy dependence of
>> p,pbar production in central Pb+Pb collisions. For convenience
>> I attach the first draft which Marek prepared for the Budapest
>> collaboration meeting. We plan to have a first discussion at
>> the next NA49 EVO conference on Wednesday, May 30.
>>
>> Hoping for your help and sending best regards,  Peter
>
>