1.1: strangth -> strength
1.2: overal -> overall
rucial -> crucial
after "additional attraction", I think "in a threshold scan" needs to be added to "at a lepton collider"
methods -> method

1.3: CLIC should be mentioned by name in the first paragraph, even if it's just to say that ILC and CLIC should have similar performance.
1.3.2: final paragraph, ILC or CLIC can determine the top width in a threshold scan
1.3.4: can the 1.4 TeV preliminary ttH cross section result be added here?
Table 1-5, CLIC CME is not 800 TeV
TLEP is often spelt TLep

1.7.3: it's not clear why this has to be in a section of it's own in the 'detectors and algorithms' section. Why aren't the CLIC top mass measurement plots and explanation in section 1.2 (top mass measurements)? And the AFB bit could go in section 1.4 (kinematics).

Throughout, they often write "the linear collider" in reference to the ILC. If it's referring specifically to ILC studies they should say ILC, otherwise "a possible future linear collider".