Reported by Everton Souza Granemann	


Vincenzo talk

Q1 (Shinji) - Could would increase the tune until reach the bare tune?  (Talking about intensity slide number 17, Measurements: intensity – programmed tunes – transverse profiles)
(Shinji self reponse) A1:  I see that the bare tune is not big enought.

(Elena Comment) A12: There is a lot of things to do yet. We are even seen coherent effects and we don't know why...

Q2 (Hannes) How many measurements were made for reproduce the plot? (Still talking about the slide number 17)
(Vincenzo) A2: 6 measurements.

Raymond talk

Q1 (Stuckmeier) You are showing a lot of results with many simulations, what is your standard simulation?
A1: (Raymond) PTC-Orbit.

Q2 (Struckmeier) What are the differences between this curves? (plot of slide 20, emittance vs turns for differents simulations)
A2: (Raymond) Noise level

Q3 (Hannes) Did you try with of 26 GeV?
A3: (Simone) We have a trasition crossing. It's complicated to do it...


Alexander Talk

Q1 (Ji) How do you measure the vertical sigma?
A1: (Alex) We use to pick ups for measure both horizontal and vertical sigma.

Q2 (Elias, Hannes) The decoherence match with simulations, concerning direct space charge for the needs of the LHC upgrade?
A2: (Alex) To check.


Magdalena Talk

Q1 (Shinji) Super Gaussian profile decrease the beam size?
A1 (Magda) Yes. We can see a comparison with a gaussian profile.

Q2 (Simone) Can you paint this kind of profile?
A2 (Magda) Yes

Q3 (Shinji) Why you this super gaussian profiles?
A3 (Jeff) Gaussian beams does not fit very well in wire scanner. This is the motivation for try different profiles.

Comment (Martini) Also, if you integrate the Super Gaussian profile you do not have a normalized result.