Present: Gunter, Andrea, Mike, Peter, Hans, Krzysztof, Seb, Tatsumi, George, Alex, Mathieu, Luciano, Vladimir, Alberto

From Gunter's presentation:

• Communicate with example WG: on Peter

• Review the name: again clarify that for validation we provide tools not single validation and regression testing. Name should reflect these activities        

• Additional proposal for names “Physics List and Performance Monitoring”, “Physics List, Performance Monitoring and Tools”. Poll will be created

• Meeting every other month. Gunter to prepare a Doodle

• Interface for automatic documentation, how to extend EM framework for that: action on Vladimir

• Documenting PLs, how to categorize “recommended” PL? By user-community, by user-cases? Guide is to how choose PL.

• IF physics list(s): we need to clarify what is the content in terms of models/processes. IF people should provide such a “menu”

• What are the way to change parameters from PLs?

• Next meeting will dedicate to these two topics: IF pls and “tuning” parameters

• Decided to use JiRA to keep track of issues (need for a “category flag”?)

From Andrea's presentation:

• Reference files. EOS supports xrootd natively, very good. However EM uses AFS for storage, can be integrated into web-system if we use HTTP w/o need to copy results to EOS. Validimir prefers this.  Andrea, Davide, Gunter, with input from Vladimir and George will come to a conclusion on that 

From Hans' presentation:

• Proposal was to form a small group with Hans , Gunter, Witek , Alberto discuss on how to attack this issue. This is at the moment in pause (see next point)

• In two weeks Hans & others, after a meeting with CERN people,  will conclude on Merging of the two web systems: if possible at all and how to address the two requests we have: overlays, searching of results form users