P2 L12 : four Gaussion functions seems to include electon, if it is the case, it's odd to say "the remaining contamination from electron..."

R: changed "contamination" to contribution

P2 Fig2 : ALICE pp 2.76TeV ... x10^-1, Is this correct? isn't it x10^-2?

R:This will be fixed on the final paper plots. Thank you for spotting this, unfortunately it cannot be changed for the moment.


P2 Chap.4 L1 : I would write in the following order, "pi0, eta, pi+-, K+- and p and p-bar", from left to right.

R:Done

P3 Chap.5 L8 : "suppression ... decreases ...", this is OK, but it would be clearer to replace "which decreases..." into "where RAA increases..."

R:The proposed modification would make the sentence much longer with an equivalent meaning. We prefere to leave it as it is.

P4 Chap.6 L1-2 : Add (Fig.5 left) before "and" and (Fig.5 right) at the end of sentence.

R: done

P4 Chap.7 L13 : "which is centrality dependent", it's not clear this is meant for eta/pi0 or K/pi, there is no significance on eta/pi0 especially on centrality dependence, but please show at least two centrality data points for K/pi, if you like to say for K/pi...
"
R:I have removed the centrality part of the phrase.