ARCH-COM 99-01

30 April 1999

 

34th Meeting of the Archive Committee

 

Minutes of the meeting held on 16 April 1999

 

Present: L. Di Lella (Chairman);  G. Veneziano (incoming Chairman);  L. Camilleri; X. Daney; H. F. Hoffmann; A. Hollier (Secretary); K. Hubner; B. Pattison; C. Pettenati; T. Pettersson.

Invited: F. Bonaudi; J. Ferguson; P. Jenni    

 

Apologies: G. Lindecker; M. Sendall

 

Agenda (as approved at the meeting)

 

1.  Minutes of last meeting (ARCH-COM 98-02)

2.  Record-keeping for ATLAS (P. Jenni)

3.  New archivist, presentation of Programme of Work (A. Hollier)

4.  Visit to new archive storage area

5.  Photo captions (F. Bonaudi)

6.  Third report of WG on Electronic Archiving (C. Pettenati)

7.  AOB

8.  Handover of chairmanship from Luigi Di Lella to Gabriele Veneziano

9.  Next meeting

 

1.  Minutes of last meeting (ARCH-COM 98-02)

The agenda and minutes were approved without changes.

 

2.  Record-keeping for ATLAS (P. Jenni)

Peter Jenni gave an overview (see enclosure 1) of the history and structure of the ATLAS project, and then moved on to discuss some specific areas and their related documents.  He stressed the size of the ATLAS collaboration (around 150 institutions, from 34 countries), and the democratic nature of its operation.  All aspects are discussed at meetings, though not all information is in the public domain. The Collaboration Board deals with all matters including elections.  PJ keeps this documentation, which includes not only board minutes, but also supporting documentation such as notes and letters.  It is kept in an orderly manner, and so far comprises about 28 volumes.

Management Notes are the personal notes of the spokesperson, covering the full spectrum of subjects and including a good deal of correspondence.  Business is often conducted in quite a formal way, particularly with the US ATLAS team, so a good deal of documentation is kept.  Around 12 volumes exist so far.

The Executive Board documents comprise about 30 volumes, including minutes (which are freely available within the collaboration, and also notes and working documents written specifically for this body.

Documentation of Plenary Meetings is mainly in the form of minutes (electronically available); but approximately one large volume of paper copies of transparencies is also generated for each Plenary Meeting and Atlas Week.

Publicly available documents are now electronically accessible; these include notes, publications, photos, and technical documents on EDMS.  As well as this documentation, which is centrally managed, there also exists a mass of information in the collaborating institutions over which CERN has no control.  

Some of the official CERN documents such as those of the LHCC (Large Hadron Collider Committee) and RRB (Resource Review Board) are also kept in paper form.

PJ concluded by stressing the confidential nature of many ATLAS documents, and suggesting that for this reason the contact person should remain the ATLAS spokeperson.

 

Discussion after the talk included consideration of the need to print copies of publicly available information which was only available online.  CP agreed that this was not necessary, since the Preprint Server and EDMS were considered to be suitable systems for long term storage of electronic archives.   CP asked if it would be possible to arrange for the collaborating  institutions to submit more of their documentation to EDMS.  PJ felt that it would be impractical and unreasonable to insist on this, but said that some had voluntarily started using the preprint server for the sake of convenience.  In any case, it would not be desirable to overload EDMS with lower level documents that had only local importance.  The chairman felt that it was better for the collaborators to be responsible for selecting what was worthy of inclusion in the Archive, and PJ mentioned the good work being done by many collaboration secretariats to organise their own records.

 

3.  New archivist, presentation of Programme of Work (A. Hollier)

AH briefly described her background in archive work and then outlined her plan of work at CERN (see enclosure 2).  She described how the Archive team is being built up again after the break following the departure of Roswitha Rahmy and Jennifer Paul.  A new archive assistant, Sandrine Reyes, was appointed in April for six months.  We also hope to have a CESID student in the autumn, and possibly a stageaire, and a CERN child for 4 weeks in June.

The immediate emphasis will be on fundamental tasks such as sorting and cataloguing the backlog of unlisted material in the Archive.  This is time-consuming, basic work, but it is necessary to stabilise the collection.  AH considers giving a good service to enquirers to be one of the highest priorities.  This requires a thorough understanding of collection and would be easier if more of it were catalogued.  The exact size of this task is not yet clear, but it is unlikely to be completed this year.

At the same time, it is necessary to establish good working relations with the Divisional Record Officers in order to establish a regular flow of documents to the Archive.  These are the people on whom the success of the CERN Archive largely depends.   Following the achievement of Operational Circular No. 3, the next step is to put it into practice without too much loss of momentum. 

It is intended that the Archive will be integrated more closely with the Library in future.  This will help to avoid duplicated effort as well as providing a more unified user interface.  The forthcoming move of the collection to the main building will assist in this.  Work relating to the move (planning, re-arranging the collection to fit the new space, relabelling boxes, altering the catalogue, and physically moving) is likely to take up most of the Archive team’s time for the next five months at least.  AH expressed thanks to Jean-Loup Denblyden and Alan Ball for all their assistance in enabling the move to go ahead. 

AH has joined the Working Group on Electronic Archives, and will contribute to finding solutions to this difficult and pressing problem. (See item 6 below).

Last but not least, she will continue to facilitate the Oral History project and the Photo Captions project. (See item 5 below).

AH said that managing the Archive currently relied heavily on the archivist’s personal knowledge of the collection, so she had a lot to learn, but she stressed her determination to build on the good work already achieved in the CERN Archive.

 

Discussion included a suggestion that AH take the opportunity of the move to review the Archive holdings and see if there are items of lower historical importance which should be removed.  AH agreed that this would be desirable, but felt there was not enough time available.  In any case, she would prefer to improve her understanding of CERN’s history and activities before embarking on this task.  HFH stressed that it would be necessary to produce guidelines for the divisions to advise them about good record keeping.  CP stressed again the importance of electronic record keeping, which will pose a serious problem in the future.

 

4.  Visit to new archive storage area

This gave members an opportunity to see the new storage area that had just been discussed.

 

5.  Photo captions (F. Bonaudi)

The selection of suitable photographs from the 1954-1964 period, and the provision of captions for them, is well under way (see enclosure 3).  It should be completed (including proof-reading) within three months.  So far 550 photos have been processed.  This represents about 5% of the total for the 1954-1964 period, and they are selected according to criteria, which ensure a representative and interesting collection.  Negatives are then scanned and entered onto the Photo Archive database, which is the responsibility of Mme. Christiane Montarbaud.  They can be accessed at http://alice.cern.ch/Photos.  FB acknowledged the work of members of the Photo Task Force and its collaborators.  Some names are currently under consideration to carry on the next phase of the project.

 

Discussion included lively appreciation of the work so far completed, and consideration of people who might continue it.   Action: FB, AH and GV are to contact potential volunteers in order to build a new team to continue this project.

 

6.  Third report of WG on Electronic Archiving (C. Pettenati)

CP reported that activity had dropped since the last Archive Committee meeting, following the departure of Jennifer Paul and the delay before the arrival of the new archivist (see enclosure 4).  However the WG had completed a questionnaire for the WWW at CERN, and had begun examining the administrative databases, starting with CFU (Contract Follow Up).  In March the WG had a first discussion of a CIS (Certified Information System) for e-mail, which is being prepared by Arnaud Taddei in response to user demand.  The WG also heard an interesting talk by David Bearman, one of the foremost world experts in electronic archives.  CP requested financial support to enable the WG to maintain some external contact, in the form of attendance at relevant conferences and a visit to a successful project in the studied area.  Action: GV and AH are to pursue this.

 

Discussion touched briefly on the question of how to select the most important records for long term storage.  One would not want to keep all e-mails or all web pages in an Archive, even if it were possible to do so.  [The fact that, in the computer world, the word ‘archive’ is used with a more general, all-embracing meaning than that used by archivists tends to lead to confusion in this area.]     The question was also raised of what should happen to electronic data for LEP (mainly engineering drawings) in the future.

 

7.  AOB

No-one has yet been found to replace Thomas Meyer as CMS contact person.  Action: GV, CP and AH are to pursue this.

In answer to a question, CP stated that funding for this year had been obtained thanks to an unexpected gift, but this was certainly exceptional and support would be needed if staffing levels were to be maintained in 2000.

 

8.  Handover of chairmanship from Luigi Di Lella to Gabriele Veneziano

On behalf of the DG, Hans Falk Hoffmann thanked Luigi Di Lella for all his good work as Chairman of the Archive Committee, and wished the new Chairman the best of luck in the post.  He stressed the importance of archives, which encapsulate the history and memory of an organisation, and he praised those who contribute to keeping the memory of CERN.  

 

9.  Next meeting

The next meeting is scheduled for

Friday, October 15 1999 at 2.30pm in 40-R-C10

 

The meeting was followed by a short drink to thank Luigi Di Lella for his work as Chairman, and to welcome the new Chairman Gabriele Veneziano.  Guests: Roswitha Rahmy and Sandrine Reyes.