Pending actions for the final version and release notes
for the e-IRG White Paper version 1.5:

- Chapter 5 (AAA) to be sent back to section editors for clarifications. Kors to revise/complement the accounting section. Still open. 

- David Kelsey to provide a recommendation for AUP section.

- Update the definitions of “a Grid” and “Grids” to match the consensus based on discussions about section 3 for the intermediate draft. 

- Revise the English of the supercomputing architecture recommendation. Section updated but recommendation missing. Patrick?

- Leif to provide link to OECD recommendations for making publicly funded research data available- DONE.

-Reviewing remaining comments and removing them from the final version. I have made some changes based on Hannelore's comments, these are with "mark changes" enabled.

-Check spelling also on the final version ("When referring to Luxembourg, please use the official French spelling with 'ou' (not Luxemburg); When referring to RESTENA please use 'RESTENA Foundation' as the name of the organisation;"  - checked in 1.4)

-Since the European Grid Organization has already started being discussed at the European Commission, it is felt that less changes are needed. The introduction included a note that more work is needed about the EGO, and the title was changed. 

-Detail: synchronize the publication status of the roadmap at the end of the chapter 2.2., add URL if possible.

-Reference to MCS paper from John Gordon added.

-Changes proposed by Manuel Delfino made in chapter 3. Incidentally, I noticed some new text in the chapter 3.5 that arrived between 1.3 and 1.3-jcg_HH, but couldn't immediately find the source. Hannelore, is this your text?

-I added a small write-up about the IGTF to the end of chapter 5.1, based on David Groep's input.

-Adapted DFN's comments. Noticed that the numbering of the pictures is funny in the section 19.5 (carries over from the corresponding text section in the main part of the document?). Numbering should be checked for the final version.

-I added a paragraph in 11.3.2. as an interpretation of the architecture based approach (need for this mentioned in the email announcing version 1.3). Should probably be checked with Victor?

Comment not yet addressed from my accompanying email to version 1.3:

-The chapter 10, "Usage Policies" does not have a recommendation separated in the text itself. Not a big issue, since the text in the chapter 10 and in the policy roadmap are consistent. However, somewhat related to the future theme of industrial outreach: I noticed that the new proposed AUP no longer seems to categorically deny for-profit (and also private) activities - assuming the VO-regulations and the  rules of the resource owners allow this. I was wondering if this change and its implications should be highlighted more in the document?

-- Matti
--Fotis, for 1.5