Ilija/Alexey: US analysis sites with "direct_access_lan" will not move for now.

Ale/Saul: confusion over what LSM refers to: propose to call site level script "LSM", and call the python code in Panda pilot "Site Mover Configuration" or "LSM driver". 

David: should check the section on "Associated DDM Storages" to make certain the list of DDM endpoints
is selected in the correct order for the panda Qs.

Joel/Horst: LUCILLE moved to new movers, see error. Note: LUCILLE_MCORE use xrdcp mover for read, lsm for write. LUCILLE_CE uses xrdcp/lsm for read, lcgcp for write/log. Is this correct?

Jose's summary on site movers and plan on moving APF:

-- we have been running for a long while a special factory setup that uses Alexey's pilot (instead of Paul's pilot) with a new input option -m1. This pilot is, as I understand, using the new movers. Alexey can correct me there if I am wrong. This dedicated setup have been submitting, at a very low rate (average 1 pilot per hour), to every single queue in US ATLAS, including T1 and all T2. If some queue is missing that was just by mistake, not on purpose.

-- As Alexey pointed out earlier, ALMOST all queues in that setup show jobs finished successfully. I understand that means that those sites are ready to work with the new movers.

-- and yes, to make it as clear as possible, lsm is being respected. Nobody is talking about replacing lsm, or changing it, or whatever

-- there is one site that seems to be failing 100% of the times with the 
Alexey's pilot: LUCILLE.
This needs to be sorted out.

-- I have checked the failure rate of every queue with both pilots 

-Alexey's and Paul's- for an entire day of production. Numbers are quite similar. The fact that we are running very few in one case plays against it, so I am not very concerned about the exact differences. The important thing is that they are similar.

-- My plan now was to move an entire factory (currently 1/3 of total production) to run only Alexey's pilot, in order to have a sense of what happen when scaling up. We have never moved anything from 0 to 100% at the factories for US ATLAS.
If having an entire factory running Alexey's pilot works fine, and failure rate are similar to the other factories, queue by queue, then I planed to switch queues in AGIS. This step assumes that running Alexey's pilot is equivalent to running 
Paul's pilot + AGIS setup for new movers.

-- If sites start playing with AGIS on their own, in parallel, my plan goes to hell. So I am going to leave to sites to decide if they still want me to take care of this or they prefer to run things on their own.