Nomenclature
- LLCP: HSCP and in-flight decay particles
- HSCP: ~stable until muon chambers
- in-flight decay particles
- disappearing track: e.g., and is too soft to be reconstructed
- kink track: e.g., and is hard enough. Possibly reconstructed as disappearing track signature if the secondary track is lost.
- non-pointing photon: e.g., , where is hard.
- displaced vertex: e.g., , where leptons are hard.
FCC-he
; pair production up to 1.7 TeV.
Possible models
Theory-motivated
- Wino LSP
- for -Wino if the other SUSY particles are decoupled.
- DM underabundant (if thermal and ).
- Higgsino LSP
- mass splitting ~355 MeV [9804359,0512090].
- DM underabundant (if thermal and ).
- Bino-Higgsino LSP
- but decay length would be too short?
- Slepton-Bino degeneracy
- DM overabundant (or co-annihilation)
- Stau-Higgsino degeneracy
- DM underabundant
- For slepton it is difficult to close the phase space; small Yukawa will not help.
-collider expectation
- HSCP will be covered upto 1.1 TeV (3 TeV) at HL-LHC (FCC-hh) [1505.02996].
- Monojet: up to 250 GeV (1 TeV) (maybe generated?), 100 (500) GeV [1404.0682].
- Disappearing: up to 150 GeV (2TeV) , 100 (500) GeV [1404.0682] (using 100% efficiency for ).
Strength of collider
- selectron will be produced more efficiently through the process
Sho’s TODOs
- Calculate production cross sections for each of above (motivated) theories
- Especially selectron case is interesting; firstly compare it with FCC-hh.
Scrap ideas
- in EP collider, the boost of the system is related to the total energy of the system? i.e., We might tell initial parton momenta if we measure ?