Here are the short notes from the discussion:
- Slide 2: abbreviations, terminology. Use O2 facility. Specyfy the number of FLP and EPN;
- Reminder slide what is the ALICE control system doing;
- Contemporary -> latest or modern;
- Slide 8: you use Mesos to build custom scheduler;
- Mesos is a tool to solve the tasks of the control system, underline that one day it might be replaced;
- Do not stick to only one (Mesos) solution;
- GO slide is kind of "preaching", just mention what we use GO for;
- You can point to the presentation of Sebastien Binet;
- Accent on the goals and not on the tools;
- DDS is not mentioned. We are searching for a scheduler, but DDS is not. The schedulers may have deployment functionality, but how the control system interacts with the devices? Using DDS or directly (slide 12)?
- It is explicit decision since we are evaluating different solutions;
- Underline it is R&D of the Run 3 Control system;
- The confusion comes from slide 12 and 13, where we have the OCC plugin and O2 executor.;
- Underline the flexibility;
- Slide 12: use simply "Process" and "Device" on the bottom;
- Slide 12: where would DDS fit in the picture?
- Slide 14 or Conclusions:
- "See also DDS poster for alternative approach to deployment on large clusters..."