Here are the short notes from the discussion:

• Slide 2: abbreviations, terminology. Use O2 facility. Specyfy the number of FLP and EPN;
• Reminder slide what is the ALICE control system doing;
• Contemporary -> latest or modern;
• Slide 8: you use Mesos to build custom scheduler;
• Mesos is a tool to solve the tasks of the control system, underline that one day it might be replaced;
• Do not stick to only one (Mesos) solution;
• GO slide is kind of "preaching", just mention what we use GO for;
  • You can point to the presentation of Sebastien Binet;
• Accent on the goals and not on the tools;
• DDS is not mentioned. We are searching for a scheduler, but DDS is not. The schedulers may have deployment functionality, but how the control system interacts with the devices? Using DDS or directly (slide 12)?
  • It is explicit decision since we are evaluating different solutions;
  • Underline it is R&D of the Run 3 Control system;
  • The confusion comes from slide 12 and 13, where we have the OCC plugin and O2 executor.;
  • Underline the flexibility;
• Slide 12: use simply "Process" and "Device" on the bottom;
• Slide 12: where would DDS fit in the picture?
• Slide 14 or Conclusions:
  • "See also DDS poster for alternative approach to deployment on large clusters..."