Attendees: Andrea, Maarten, Romain, Hannah, Nicolas, Mischa

Notes: 

• There is significant overlap between profiles
• Suggestion to create a single WLCG Profile where groups/capabilities/PPI can be requested via scope requests
  • Slight hiccup over nbf (required by sci-tokens but wouldn't make sense in certain flows)
• In OIDC there are two tokens, semantically different. To trigger this you would include the OIDC scope and get the tokens returned with claims according to your scope request
• Basic claims should be limited and opaque 
• To request specific claims (e.g. capability scopes, groups, personally identifying information) clients should use scope requests
  • We will need to define how claims can be requested
  • The token issuer will be able to restrict scope requests for clients
• Concern that tokens may inflate with large numbers of groups, discussion on whether more fine grained control can be 
• Even if a client only has an access token, they can still request PII by calling a second endpoint
• Discussion whether there are security implications of being able to include the data in either token
• Updates
  • Romain asked Management Board about data retention = they want 1 month, this is not the source of truth
  • Privacy Statements need to be updated and discussed with HR

TODOs:

• Define the scopes that will be used to request claims

Actions:

• Andrea to start a thread with a summary of discussion