00:48:39	Alejandro Vaquero (University of Utah):	Can we assume that the left plot was calculated at equal computational cost for each one of the options (conventional and LMA)?
00:48:45	Alejandro Vaquero (University of Utah):	(Slide 5)
01:21:17	Martin Hoferichter:	Do the window results all include the IB effects?
01:21:41	Christoph Lehner:	The window results are all only for the isospin-symmetric light-quark connected
01:22:04	Martin Hoferichter:	How is the R-ratio value corrected for this?
01:22:21	Christoph Lehner:	Calculate R-ratio and subtract from the lattice the strange, disconnected, IB contributions
01:27:08	Laurent Lellouch:	Could I also comment/question?
01:27:48	Christoph Lehner:	Yes, raising hand works and I would call people in order
01:43:10	Ruth Van de Water:	Christoph, I have another way of answering this.
01:43:24	Ruth Van de Water:	(Trying to, I mean.)
01:44:39	Ruth Van de Water:	NP.  :)
02:21:14	Silvano Simula:	I have a comment
02:22:13	Savvas Zafeiropoulos:	Clover is in the fermion part of the action in order to be able to reach the phys. Point with Wilson type of fermions
02:23:58	Savvas Zafeiropoulos:	In the same way that CLS needs twisted-mass reweighting to go to the physical point with Wilson-clover quarks
02:25:02	Christoph Lehner:	Reconvene at 5pm CET

Break

02:39:58	Davide Giusti:	Yes, Martin, QED, EW, HLbL, HVP-HO are subtracted. As for (g-2)_e I agree, the 2.7 sigma we find is dominated by the electron anomaly tension. We could discuss further on Friday, of course.
03:00:52	Jamie Hudspith:	I thought the disconnected was from the frequency splitting method
03:01:05	Daniel Mohler:	The disconnected is from a new method.
03:01:08	Jamie Hudspith:	Not the hierarchical probing
03:01:19	Andreas Risch:	Indeed
03:01:19	Jamie Hudspith:	Which is being used here
03:01:23	Daniel Mohler:	We used a variant of that.
03:01:29	Jamie Hudspith:	Exactly