Hsu:

Thanks for the nice draft. It generally reads nice. I just have a few questions on some slides. Look forward to some clarifications in the slide to address my questions.

p2 Since you mentioned reinterpretation, do you want to show how the results are, or attach them to the backup slide?

p6 It's nice to see study of different radius. Is there a concluding statement about the logic behind choosing R=1.2?

p10 Why do you only test VR K-N? What happen to VR L-M?

p10 Is it OK to show data? 

p11 Is 60% the size of systematic uncertainty?

Is there quantitative argument to support the claim of stronger sensitivity than re-interpretation?

If not, I would suggest to rephrase that quantitative comparison to the improvement against re-interpretation is work in progress.