<p><strong>Miha</strong></p>

<p>This is a nice and a very interesting poster! I have a few comments that you could consider below.</p>

<p><u>General comments</u></p>

<p>If presented virtually, consider using the mouse pointer to guide the audience and zoom-in to the parts of the poster you are presenting.</p>

<p>I believe that Figure 2 was never explicitly pointed out and explained. Consider talking about it more at the relevant time.</p>

<p>Several acronyms are used. Make sure that they are all defined in the text. Furthermore, it would be better to spell them out verbally when you are givin the presentation in my opinion. For example, I could not remember what PAP and OTF stand for and it would be easier to follow if you always spelled them out.</p>

<p><u>Section specific comments</u></p>

<p>Reference Based Predictions / OTF Predictions<br>
-----------</p>

<p>It would be good to point the audience to Figure 1 when you talk about the attenuation period, since the figure really nicely demonstrates that. Do you understand why the blue curve on the figure goes way up and suddenly drops down to the online / predicted baseline after 10h? That's a question that someone could easily ask.</p>

<p>Automated Bunch Factor<br>
-----------</p>

<p>What is the IS monitor? Better to avoid acronyms if possible when presenting to a non-expert audience.<br>
&nbsp;</p>

<p>Grafana<br>
-----------</p>

<p>What does TRP stand for?</p>