- Compact style
- Indico style
- Indico style - inline minutes
- Indico style - numbered
- Indico style - numbered + minutes
- Indico Weeks View
ZOOM room: https://cern.zoom.us/s/8636979909
MW1
- Assume to use FLP suite 0.14
- Do not use ECS for the entire chain
- Refurbish scripts (Mikolaj)
- Switches from Andrea
- Logs in a single place (Mikolaj)
- Pre-cooked readout.cfg for all configs/workflows
- ...
- 2 days of VS
--- Up to 8 detectors (optimistic). i.e. 2 h per test (end-to-end data with generic QC)
- 3 days of detector MW
--- Up to 6 detectors, i.e. half-day each
--- Goals:
------ Collect substantial data w/ different conditions (e.g. trigger rates, ZS on/off)
---------- Offline studies of data integrity, compression factors...
------ Use detector-specific QC
------ Study latency (e.g. TRD) coupling FLPs w/ and w/o compression
Detector breakdown:
HMPID:
- VS quick test
- QC (FLP + EPN)
MCH:
- VS test of continuos readout (last VS failed)
- Extended data taking (cont readout) and QC (FLP + EPN)
TRD
- VS quick test (adding the compressor - not ready in Dec)
- Extended data taking (w/ and w/o compressor) and QC (FLP + EPN)
TOF
- To be discussed with them, otherwise their Dec test is complete.
TPC
- FLP checkpoints using CRU-UL (only some sectors in C-side)
- Data storage (data registration OK but out of DD). Can be activated if they need
- Discuss the studies/test to validate their UL (what they need from O2)
PHOS:
- VS test only?
EMCAL:
- Preparation (new FLP suite and new FW OK)
- Simple VS only or more (compressor i.e. formatter?). Move it from FLP to EPN interesting?
- Some QC
CPV:
- ?
Synthetic tests:
- Massimo