Speakers
Mr
Bogdan Wąs
(The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland)Mr
Mirosław Bartyzel
(The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland)Dr
Ryszard Misiak
(The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland)
Description
Abstract – The yield of release of radioiodine from pressed elemental tellurium target and both sublimation and evaporation rate of target material were investigated under different experimental conditions.
Keywords – elemental tellurium target, dry distillation
I. Introduction
A separation of radioiodine by a dry distillation from irradiated TeO2 target is widely used[1-6]. Until now, one work on studies on the separation of radioiodine by dry distillation from irradiated elemental tellurium target was published by Acerbi et. al.[7] in the seventies. In recent years the separation of radioiodine by anion-exchange and solvent extraction from metallic tellurium target was also investigated[8]. In the present work the dry distillation method of radioiodine from irradiated elemental tellurium target was studied.
II. Experimental
The thickness of pressed tellurium powder with a natural isotopic composition was about 320 mg/cm2. Some of the targets were initially heated at a temperature 713 K and pressure 0.7 Pa by 10 minutes before an irradiation. The irradiation condition was 20 nA as proton of energy 60 MeV for 2-3 h at the Cracow AIC-144 cyclotron. Target after irradiation was placed in a quartz tube of 10 mm diameter. Performed two series of experiments: under reduced pressure – 0.7 Pa and at a flow of Ar - 15 cm3/min. The duration of each experiment was 40 minutes after reaching a given temperature.
III. Results and discussion
The yield of release of radioiodine from target matrix and evaporation rate of target material were investigated under reduced pressure – 0.7 Pa for temperatures from 713 K to 823 K. The yield of release of radioiodine was about 65% for 713 K and reached the value 95% for 823 K. The tellurium loss in the separation conditions was 4% for temperature 713 K and increasing to 44% for 823 K. In the second series of experiments initially heated targets and Ar gas flux of 15 cm3/min were used for temperatures lower then the melting point – 723 K of tellurium from 623 K to 713 K. A low yield of separation radioiodine was observed in the temperature range 623 K to 673 K. With the increase of process temperature to 713 K a significant increase of yield of dry distillation of iodine took place and reached the value about 65%. The tellurium losses in this temperature were from 3 to 4%. Comparing the obtained results of yield of release of radioiodine for targets with and without initially heating showed that the yield was higher by 12% at 698 K and about 17% at 713 K for targets without heating. There was no significant differences between the target material losses for a given temperatures. The sublimated tellurium condensed from 656 K to 575 K but the adsorption zone of radioiodine starting from 575 K to 320 K at the flow conditions. Due to overlapping the peaks the loss of radioiodine was 1,5%.
IV. Conclusion
The studies allowed to obtain the following conditions for the separation process: yield of release of radioiodine 85% (target without initially heating) and 65% (target with initially heating) at temperature 713 K. It follows that to achieve 85% efficiency of release will be required to reestablish the original properties of the tellurium powder. The sublimation of tellurium was 3-4% from initial mass. In comparison with TeO2 target the yield of separation of radioiodine is lower then 14% (for the 40 minutes experiment). Taking into account the adsorption temperature of radioiodine it is possible to transport radioiodine to attached trapping device by heating the part of quartz tube beetwen end of furnace and attached trapping device at temperature above 385 K. Based on the results further tests are planned.
Acknowledgement: The work was done within framework of Polish Governmental Strategic Project: Supporting technologies for the development of safe nuclear power, Action 4: Development of techniques and technologies supporting management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste (No SP/J/4/143321/11)
1. R. Van Den Bosch, J.J.M. De Goeij, J.A. Van Der Heide, J.F.W. Tertoolen, H.M.J. Theelen, C. Zegers, „A new approach to target chemistry fort he iodine-123 production via the 124Te(p,2n) reaction.”, International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 28 (1977) 255
2. F. Oberdorfer, F. Helus, W. Maier-Borst, “Experiences in the routine production of 123I via the 124Te(p,2n)123I reaction with a low energy cyclotron”, Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry 65 (1981) 51
3. E. J. Knust, K. Dutschka, R. Weinreich, “Preparation of 124I solutions after thermodistillation of irradiated 124TeO2 targets”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 52 (2000) 181
4. Matthias Glaser, D.B. Mackay, A.S.O. Ranicar, S.L. Waters, F. Brady, and S.K. Luthra, “Improved targetry and production of iodine-124 for PET studies.”, Radiochimica Acta 92 (2004) 951
5. Jonathon A. Nye, Miguel A. Avila-Rodriguez, and Robert J. Nickles, “Production of [124I]-iodine on an 11 MeV cyclotron.”, Radiochimica Acta 94 (2006) 213
6. Kotaro Nagatsu, Masami Fukada, Katsuyuki Minegishi, Hisashi Suzuki, Toshimitsu Fukumura, Hiromichi Yamazaki, Kazutoshi Suzuki, “Fully automated production of iodine-124 using a vertical beam.”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 69 (2011) 146
7. E. Acerbi, C. Birattari, M. Castiglioni, F. Resmini, “123I production at the Milan AVF Cyclotron”, Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry 34 (1976) 87
8. K. M. El-Azony and S. M. Qaim, „ Anion-exchange and solvent extraction studies on the separation of radioiodine with particular reference to the production of 123I via proton irradiation of 123Te metal target.”, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 275 (2008) 275
Primary author
Dr
Ryszard Misiak
(The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland)
Co-authors
Mr
Bogdan Wąs
(The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland)
Mr
Mirosław Bartyzel
(The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland)