CERN-NDGF Meeting

Europe/Zurich
40/R-D10 (CERN)

40/R-D10

CERN

20
Show room on map
Les Robertson (CERN)
more information
    • 1
      Architecture of the Tier-2s within NDGF
      (how do they appear to the rest of the world? as single sites with a CE and SE?)
    • 2
      Storage element
      • a) Status of the virtual Storage Element that presents NDGF as a single site for storage management and data access
      • b) Analysis of the internal data rates within the NDGF Tier-1
        (some concern that these may be higher than currently assumed)
      • c) Operation of the File Transfer Service for communication with other Tier-1s (ATLAS) and other Tier-2s (potentially for ATLAS, definitely for CMS if NDGF is a CMS Tier-1)
      • d) Implementation of the ATLAS data placement model
        (RAW data and all its derivatives at the same site)
      • e) Implementation of the base SRM functionality (SRM v 2.2) and storage classes
      • f) Provision of a catalog equivalent to LFC for ATLAS
    • 3
      Progress and plans for the distributed database service for ATLAS in NDGF
      (3D project)
    • 4
      Provision of site availability metrics
    • 5
      Model for NDGF daily operation and integration with the LCG/EGEE grid operations services
    • 6
      Accounting plans
      see accounting presentations at the GDB (06dec06, 09jan07) and the discussions and decisions at the MB (19dec06, 08jan07)
      • a) Integration of cpu accounting with the APEL repository at the GOC
      • b) User-level accounting
      • c) Storage accounting
    • 7
      Implementation of scheduling priorities based on VOMS groups and roles
    • 8
      Installation schedule for 2007
    • 9
      Status and plans for testing the distributed Tier-1 functionality and integrating into the ATLAS and ALICE services
    • 10
      Organisational and management issues
      • a) Is it clear now how CMS fits in to NDGF, organisationally and technically?
      • b) Formal resource commitments for the Nordic countries and signing the MoU
      • c) NDGF representation in the WLCG Overview Board, and Computing Resource Review Board
      • d) Does NDGF feel adequately represented in the various WLCG boards, committees and meetings, and does it feel that it is well enough informed about the activity of the project?
    • 11
      Conclusion and next steps