CCT R&D meeting #4

→ Europe/Zurich

Attendees: Helene Felice, Arnaud Foussat, Ariel Haziot, Glyn Kirby, Davide Tomasini

 

Discussion over the field target

  • DT noticed that the field in the demonstrator is only 3T, with peak field at 4.2T on conductor.
    • This could be an issue as a 4T magnet was "sold".
    • It seems extremely inefficient. In order to get 4T inside, one would need up to 5T in conductor.
    • the inefficiency comes from the ratio of the aperture over the length
  • We should try to get the field to 4T inside
    • proposing an operation at 90% SS
    • reducing the aperture
    • reducing the angle and consequently the overall length of the magnet

Actions for GK: scan the area of aperture and angle in order to get closer to 4T inside without increasing the peak field too much.

Compute the integrated field (for 5 T peak field on the conductor) as a function of the winding angle for :

  • 90° bending angle and 236 mm diameter
  • 45° bending angle and 100 mm diameter

Design advancements by GK

  • tapered former/coil idea to get a conical joint
  • error correction in the demonstrator design
  • leads impact improvements, idea to get the leads out of the coil plane
  • adapting the angle of the second layer to equal the length of the first layer

R&D update by AH

  • List of technological choices
    • no Rutherford cable test
  • Small box program
    • important first is the stacking feasibility
    • do whatever resin is available (PU, stycast, ...)
  • Subscale program
    • AH still needs the designs. GK has them,
    • Action: AH should ask for them in separate discussion
  • Resistive CCT program
    • The first small dipole is ready for production, former in 3D and flanges in G10.
    • The CLIC power unit is good to start with but our need are going towards higher capacitance at lower voltage. DT believes we could adapt a capacitance rack while keeping the electronic.
    • AF wonders about the purpose of this program. It is true that it lost a lot of purpose since the combined function is not the target. Still, it is a good way to produce small field and develop processes.

Round cable developments by AH

  • First proposals from CGP
    • external diameters ranging from 3 to 5 mm
    • inside wire are non insulated 0.85 or 0.48 mm
    • insulated copper core
    • possibilities to twist in different direction if multiple steps (longer and more expensive)
    • other design includes insulated wires in the cable
  • Table of selected configurations with the required current and length
    • Current in cable is very high (4.4 kA)
    • We should consider 2 options
      • non insulated 0.48 mm wire, 3 mm cable
      • insulated 0.85 mm wire, 4 mm cable

Action: AH works on finding a configuration with 2.5 kA maximum. GK could start making a model with the round cables and see what it gives.

Action: AH checks availability of of LHC strand with SCD.

Afterwards, we could propose something more solid to SCD in order to start a proper cable development.

 

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.