8th BCD ISHEP Cargèse School

Survey

Questionnaire for improving next editions of the school

What is your current study level*

Master 1st year

Master 2d year

PhD 1st year

Higher than above

Lower than above

What was your main expectation about the school?*

Refine your PhD project

Meet other students with interests close to yours

Have an updated overview of Particle Physics

Deepen your knowledge on the topic you want to work on

Other

Has your expectation been satisfied? To which extent?

Please give two main positive aspects of the school

Please give (at least) two negative aspects of the school

Did you find the choice of subjects appropriate?*

Yes

No

Do you think 90 minute lectures are the right quanta? It not, which duration do you think would be more appropriate?*

Keep the same duration: 1h30

Shorter lectures: 1h

Longer lectures: 2h with a short break in the middle

Did you find the balance between lectures/student talks appropriate?*

Yes

No

Which courses topics would you have lengthened?*

Orloff

Maltoni

Carbone

Albrecht

Sioli

Stamou

Kroeninger

Donini

Monteil

Which courses topics would you have shortened or eliminated?*

Orloff

Maltoni

Carbone

Albrecht

Sioli

Stamou

Kroeninger

Donini

Monteil

Are there additional subjects that you would have liked to add to the programme?*

Yes

No

If yes, which ones?

Overall, how do you rate the quality of the lectures?*

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Overall, how do you rate the level of the lectures?*

Too easy

Too difficult

Right level

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by J. Orloff?*

In your evaluation, take into consideration the interest of the topic as well as the level, the quality and the pedagogical aspects of the lectures themselves. Add any comment you may have on the lectures.

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by F. Maltoni?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by A. Carbone?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by J. Albrecht?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by M. Sioli?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by E. Stamou?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by K. Kroeninger?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by J. Donini?*

On a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (worst), how would you rate the lectures by S. Monteil?*

Overall assessment of the accommodation, conference facilities and catering*

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Remarks on accommodation, conference facilities and catering?

Feel free to give any remark/complaint/suggestion you might have

How would you rate your interactions with the other participants*

Borderline

Unsatisfactory

Satisfactory

Very satisfactory

How would you rate your interactions with the lecturers?*

Borderline

Unsatisfactory

Satisfactory

Very satisfactory

Please specify which of the following led to the most interesting interactions with participants or lecturers?*

Lectures

Beach time

Music evenings

Sports occasions

Meals

Coffee breaks

Overall evaluation of the school: coverage of the proposed topics*

Bad

Poor

Average

Good

Excellent

Overall evaluation of the school: interest for your research project*

Bad

Poor

Average

Good

Excellent

Overall evaluation of the school: school density*

Not enough free time

Not enough lectures

Just fine

Overall evaluation of the school: general organisation*

Bad

Poor

Average

Good

Excellent

Overall evaluation of the school: pedagogical approach (methods used by the lecturers)*

Bad

Poor

Average

Good

Excellent

Overall evaluation of the school: benefits for your studies and/or PhD work*

Bad

Poor

Average

Good

Excellent

Did you know this school was sponsored by the French-German University ?

Yes

No

FGU supports other French-German research opportunities:
https://www.dfh-ufa.org/en/programme/research-programmes

General remarks you might want to share with us

Any topic welcome! But we would be particularly interested in suggestions to encourage mixed nationalities groups at lunch or coffee breaks...

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.