ML4Jets2024

Survey

Post workshop survey

Attendance

Have you been on site at least one day ?*

Yes

No

Have you followed at least one session remotely ?*

Yes

No

Which of these sessions did you mostly follow ?*

Invited talks

Mixed sessions

Reconstruction

Theorie

Event Generation : Monte Carlo

Tagging

Event Generation

Detector Simulation

Uncertainties @ Interpretability

Astro & Cosmo

Anomaly Detection

Unfolding & Inference

Foundation Models

(multiple answers possible)

Scientific organisation

How would you rate the scientific organization of the program ?*

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

If you've given a talk, how would you rate the experience ?*

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

No talk

What is you opinion on the choice to grant as many talks as possible, with three full days of two parallel sessions ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Would you say that overall the amount of free time for discussion was

No selection

much too little

too little

enough

too much

much too much

Do you think the event has brought to you :

New ideas

New Insights

New possible collaborators

Tighten ties with possible collaborators

(multiple answers)

And now on the talks. We won't ask you to grade each talk, but to indicate to us your top 3 of the talks which made the most lasting impression to you, which you 're most likely to recommend to colleagues.

Please indicate (with speaker last name) one talk among top three

Please indicate (with speaker last name) one talk among top three

Please indicate (with speaker last name) one talk among top three

On the scientific organisation, any remark, suggestion, which can be passed to ML4Jets 2025 organisers ?

Logistics, catering and social events

How would you rate overall the logistics organisation ?*

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

On the logistics etc... , any remark ?

How easy was it for you to find an accomodation ?

No selection

very difficult

difficult

OK

easy

How would you rate the workshop premises and equipements ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

(if you have been on site)

How would you rate the workshop zoom experience ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

(if you have indeed followed at least one session by zoom)

How did you like the Tuesday lunch in tower Zamansky ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

(if you have indeed followed at least one session by zoom)

How did you like Wednesady dinner at Bouillon Racine ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

(if you have indeed followed at least one session by zoom)

Any comment/suggestion on logistic, catering and social events ?

Now a bit about you :

Your gender

No selection

Female

Male

Your academic experience*

before PhD

doing PhD

<4 years after PhD

4 to 10 years after PhD

11 to 20 years after PhD

>20 years after PhD

None of the above

Your primary background*

High Energy Physics (HEP)

non HEP physics

Computer Science

other

Your country of affiliation

Final comments

Final remark/suggestion which could not fit above

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.