Description
Scope: Discuss the status of the cosmic tensions
Questions:
Could systematics still “solve” the Hubble tension, or are we at a point where new physics is needed?
How should we interpret the new results from Wendy Freedman et al?
Given the many future probes, and the fact that Bayesian analyses suffer from prior effects, what is the best way to actually assess if there are tensions (barring systematics)?
What can we learn from recently revealed systematics in type Ia data used in DESI constraints on time varying DE equation of state ?
What can/should make an observational anomaly a reliable candidate for cosmological signal ?
What is the best strategy to assess the potential for learning about cosmology from future anomalies in systematics-driven measurements ?
What is the timeline for e.g. 1% determination of H0 from probes such as standard sirens and strongly lensed quasars?
What is better NPIPE or Plik for CMB?
Can lab-based particle physics (accelerator physics, neutrino detectors, dark matter detectors, etc.) be relevant for understanding the solutions to cosmic tensions, and if so, how?
