Common Project meeting 16

Europe/Zurich
Zoom Meeting ID
69734101781
Host
Piet Verwilligen
Useful links
Join via phone
Zoom URL
    • 15:00 15:20
      News 20m
      Speaker: Luigi Longo (Universita e INFN, Bari (IT))

      SPS testbeam:

      • runs taken: 
        • HV scan on top/mesh and drift
        • X&Y scan
        • pions run at different intensity
      • links:
        • run spreadsheet
        • data storage: 

          /eos/user/h/hcal/Documents/TestBeam2024/gddRun

      • notes:
        • able to take very long and stable runs up to 1M events per run
        • tracker made of 2 Tmm plus the GEM one placed at the end of the calo structure
        • towards the end, changed the flex adaptors with PCBs one -> no dead channels; decided to change all the adapors for PS testbeam
        • MM-RM3 -> the plot sent via email done using only pad chambers; understood that the inefficiency on MM-RM3 is a misalignment problem

      PS testbeam:

      • runs taken:
        • X&Y scan -> reperformed after having changed all adaptors -> at a first look, only noisy channels and no dead channel
        • energy scan from 11 to 3 GeV
      •  links
        • spreadsheet 
        • data storage:
          • /eos/user/h/hcal/Documents/TestBeam2024/PStestbeam2024

      •  

        notes: 
        • energy scan runs performed adding the CTF clock in AND with the scintillators
        • RHUM & MPGDHCAL sharing the same trigger -> possibility to perform offline matching between the 2 DAQ system

       

      What to look at (link):

      • SPS:
        • Tracker: 2Tmm+GEM 

        • check the charge sharing / cross-talk for calo chambers

        • charge distribution (MPV) as a function of HV

        • cluster size Vs top/Mesh HV

        • spatial resolution Vs top/Mesh HV

        • efficiency (with tracker) Vs top/Mesh HV

        • efficiency (with tracker) Vs Drift HV

        • uniformity (for each position we need to recheck the alignment )

        • timing Vs top/Mesh & drift HV (must be done from the Tmm+GEM)

        • Pions run: charge distribution Vs Rate; efficiency Vs rate

        • muons Vs Pions 




      • PS:
        • configuration to have similar MPV for all the chambers and high E-Drift

          • check the charge sharing / cross-talk -> double check nothing is changed wrt SPS, in the without absorber configuration

        • uniformity

        • shower:

          • number of hits Vs energy with data/MC simulation

          • charge/per pad / per  layer  Vs energy

          • re-run geant4 simulation to recheck digital and semidigital

          • timing

        • mips pion Vs muons PID

        • timing with higher flow rate

        • Rhum:

          • check clusters extrapolation

          • DAQ system

    • 15:20 16:40
      Testbeams discussion