Quick look back at what the posts are about.
Operations falls under "WP-C Grid Deployment, Operations and Support". It was defined in the GridPP4 proposal as "Coordination across Grid operational tasks including infrastructure wide monitoring, data handling, security, release management, training, documenting and support of institute based system administrators. The GridPP “Ops-Team” and NGI-based operations will be essential for the coherent and secure operation of a UK Grid. The support for data handling is mission-critical for the efficient extraction of physics results."
"In GridPP3, there are 21 FTE supporting the Tier-2s; 13 System Administrators, 4 Tier-2 coordinators; and 4 deputy coordinators funded by EGEE. ... Instead, this proposal requests just 21 FTE, consisting of 13 system-administrators and 8 more senior posts that will, in addition, take specific national responsibilities in the core Grid Operations team described in Section 8. These 8 operations experts or coordinators effectively replace the roles of the existing 8 Tier-2 coordinators and their deputies, building on that successful structure but engaging more sites directly in the national operations."
Then for the section 8 summary see the attached PDF.
ATLAS defined 5 'group analysis sites' and CMS 3. These provide the 8 mentioned above. In addition there are others who contribute to the core activities by virtue of having a cross site role or being part NGI/EGI funded. There are no clear distinctions in several cases. What we arrived at so far is this breakdown for the initial allocations.
Region On Duty - shifts
Daniela – Stuart – John – Andrew – Kashif
Ops tasks
Core grid services/Monitoring/Regional tools = Mark/David/Kashif
Security = Ewan(/Rob)
Documentation/website = Andrew/Stephen
Wider VO services = Chris
Staged rollout = Daniela/Duncan
Ticket follow-up = Stephen/Matt
On-duty coordination = Jeremy
Accounting = Rob/Alessandra
Other grids = Stuart
It needs to be clear that the names are the people COORDINATING the task area. So they are the ones expected to report on those areas at ops team meetings. What will they be reporting, what tasks define the coordination role and activity in that area? That is what we need to define and conclude on at the F2F core team meeting at QMUL on 11th November.
The tasks are currently 'defined' in the wiki with linked pages that are dedicated to defining that particular task. https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Category:GridPP_Operations is the main page. Then an example linked page is: https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Staged_rollout. The text in these pages should evolve to reflect what the *team* believe is required from these tasks (and want to happen) and in this and some of the upcoming meetings there is a focus section on the agenda that should be led by the task leads to get input on the task from the whole team (Jeremy's initial thoughts are the text to kick off the discussions). Everyone in the team can be expected to contribute in some way to several tasks but the named people are the ones responsible for developing it (with Jeremy... but since he is away you have your chance to set out some of your own ideas!).
At the F2F meeting we will go through each area (including the special one of strategy) and agree what we expect from each area, who will provide extra effort and how we will monitor progress. We need a coherent structure of work in place and showing results by April when we will report at GridPP28. The focus for all of this is improving and streamlining operations and the better we couple with the experiment needs the better (so for example the monitoring activity might include working with people on the WLCG dashboard and the staged rollout might include providing some effort to test requested experiment deployments). If all this sounds rather wooly then that's because it is! It is up to the ops-team to build better processes for monitoring tickets, validating accounting and spotting problems, getting missing documentation written etc. We are already doing some of the activities but in an adhoc and uncoordinated way.