201st EATM Meeting
-
-
14:00
→
14:05
News 5m
- Approval of the 200' EATM Minutes
Speakers: Dipanwita Banerjee (CERN), Laurie Nevay (CERN), Silvia Schuh (CERN) -
14:05
→
14:10
Action items 5mSpeaker: Dipanwita Banerjee (CERN)
-
14:10
→
14:25
Key information from different meetings 15m
Pre-distributed information + SBA highlights Lazzaroni)
ECRs
Planning & Important DatesSpeakers: Bastien Rae (CERN), Dipanwita Banerjee (CERN), Giulia Romagnoli (CERN), Michael Lazzaroni (CERN), Natalya Kahn-
Pre-distributed Information 2mSpeakers: Aboubakr Ebn Rahmoun (CERN), Dipanwita Banerjee (CERN), Michael Lazzaroni (CERN), Sylvain Girod (CERN)
-
ECR 5mSpeakers: Giulia Romagnoli (CERN), Natalya Kahn
-
Planning and important dates 5mSpeaker: Bastien Rae (CERN)
-
-
14:25
→
14:35
MUonE bunched beam request 10mSpeakers: Umberto Marconi, Umberto Marconi (Universita e INFN, Bologna (IT))
-
14:35
→
14:45
LS3 running facilities update – Neutrino Platform 10mSpeaker: Bastien Rae (CERN)
-
14:45
→
14:55
XCED Consolidation Status Update 10mSpeaker: Krystian Sidorowski (CERN)
-
14:55
→
15:05
Naming change update 10mSpeaker: Giulia Romagnoli (CERN)
-
15:05
→
15:25
News from Experiments 20m
-
IRRAD/CHARM 5mSpeakers: Federico Ravotti (CERN), Giuseppe Pezzullo (CERN), Salvatore Danzeca (CERN), Salvatore Fiore (CERN)
-
AMBER 5mSpeaker: Benjamin Moritz Veit (Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz (DE))
-
NA62 5mSpeaker: Roberto Piandani (Univ. Autonoma de San Luis Potosi)
-
NA64 5mSpeakers: Laura Molina Bueno (Univ. of Valencia and CSIC (ES)), Vladimir Poliakov (Millennium Institute for Subatomic Physics at High Energy Frontier (CL))
-
NA61 5mSpeaker: Bartosz Maksiak (National Centre for Nuclear Research (PL))
- NA61/SHINE got the beam on last Wednesday, first physics data taking started on Sunday early evening
- We got the 13 GeV/c beam pretty quickly from Nikos, but we are unable to select protons at that beam momentum due to CEDAR gas unable to be pumped to 11 bar (the pressure saturates at 10 bar). It is due to nitrogen dewar supplying the gas to CEDAR cannot hold higher pressures. We run now at 15 GeV/c.
- Delay wire chambers have low efficiency. So far we are going to try with increasing high voltages on them (2900 V).
- New barriers and ladders were installed in PPE152, but we are only partially satisfied. The vertical ladders feel less safe to climb and definitely less safe to go down. We put back our old ladder. We are however happy about the gates that open only towards the concrete platform.
- VERTEX-1 magnet issue. The magnet cannot hold higher currents due to instabilities in the cryo cooling system. At the moment the magnet makes our 150 GeV/c ion run in August impossible. We cooperate with Cryo team. They plan to make a test tomorrow to confirm one of possible culprits.
A fragment of an e-mail from Nicolas Guillotin summarizing our most recent meeting:
This year, a first run for VERTEX1 stood in March, from week 10 to 14. Issues were observed concerning the cryostat liquid helium level oscillations on March 15th while operating at 5kA.
Active investigations were led by TE-CRG after the first run to find the possible reason for this issue.
A mechanical default on turbine 1 in the cold box was found, on April 24th.
TE-CRG considered at this moment that the lack of cryo performance was related to this major cold box equipment. The turbine was changed and circuits re-conditioned.On May 26th TE-CRG decided to anticipate the cooling restart for VERTEX 1 and to check the performance. During the second phase of cooling, mid-June, while circulating with liquid helium in magnet, we concluded that an issue persisted unfortunately.
In the meantime, we restarted investigations at cold for all components of our cryogenics system : Compressor, Cold Box and Cryostat.
We succeeded in quantifying the filling rate of the Cryostat in %/h during the phase of liquid helium filling: about 16%/h for Vertex 2 to be compared to about 5%/h for Vertex1.
However, it does not indicate the origin of the issue for Vertex1.
Either it is a reduction of capacity from the cold box, or an increase in consumption (heat load) in the cryostat or even on magnet side. It is unlikely, but not strictly impossible. No known instrumentation on magnet.No clear default has been identified yet concerning the compressor, the cold box process, the temperature and pressure setting of the cold box, the turbines nor the valves and no pollution, no clogging.
A possible candidate could be a cold box insulation vacuum slow degradation. -
CLOUD 5mSpeaker: Antti Onnela (CERN)
-
GIF++ 5mSpeaker: Paolo Martinengo (CERN)
-
HiRadMat 5mSpeakers: Alice Marie Goillot, Nikolaos Charitonidis (CERN)
-
- 15:25 → 15:55
-
14:00
→
14:05