MC-ITN MC-PAD, 7th phone meeting

Friday 31 Aug 2007, 15:00 → 16:30 Europe/Zurich

CERN

Full proposal. Discussion of draft 1. call from outside CERN +41 22 76 77000 'ITN particle detectors'

agenda Agenda_31_Aug_2007.doc Agenda_31_Aug_2007.pdf

Commitment letter companies Commitment_letter_companies.doc Commitment_letter_companies.pdf

Detailed Budget Estimate MC-PAD-Budget-Estimate.xls

Propsal Draft1 (31/8, 8:28) MC-PAD_full_draft1.doc MC-PAD_full_draft1.pdf

============================================= FP7 MC-ITN Proposal - "MC-PAD" Phone meeting 31.8.2007 (15:00-16:30) http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=20446 -- Summary & Homework -- ============================================= Participants: Pierluigi Campana (LNF) Doris Eckstein (Hamburg Uni) Marek Idzik (Krakow - AGH) Christian Joram (CERN) Els Koffeman (Nikhef) Peter Krizan (Ljubljana) Michael Moll (CERN), minutes Joachim Mnich (DESY) Christian Schmidt (GSI) Excused: Tilman Rohe (PSI) ============================================= !!!!! Urgent Homework !!!!!!!!!! All missing project descriptions have to be submitted until Monday evening 17:00. Later in the evening C.Joram will produce the next version of the proposal which will be the basis for discussions/editing work at the 'NIKHEF meeting' (submission by e-mail to editors and via upload to indico page age) # C.Joram will create a indico page on which all useful material for the 'NIKHEF meeting' will be collected --> MC-PAD Material Store: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=20624 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discussions: # Chapter B4 (Editors: Christian Schmidt) # B.4.1. Capacities ... appears to be too long, we might have to find another way to present the capacities by e.g. grouping accelerator labs, universities, associated partners, industry # B.4.2 Work Plan - Strategy for B.4.2: a) describe a generic workplan b) use P1 as an example and produce a detailed workplan c) list P2 to P11 with short descriptions and only in more detail if strong deviation from generic worplan presented before (e.g. necessary for software project) # B.4.6. Do we need to appoint a committee working on "Dissemination of best practice, training and event planning"?? - Comment on Training (Els): Guide of applicants states that training at each partner should be explicitly listed up?(to be verified!) - Comment on layout: Referees will get black/white copies: check color diagrams/figures for readability - Industrial Partners: Letter arrived from Evatronix. Very constructive. No feedback from Photonis, Micron ==> to be contacted by C.Joram and M.Moll on Monday morning ==> we need the letters of commitment! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Chapter B5 (Editors: Doris Eckstein and Els Koffeman) # B.5.3. Too strong focus on CERN ? # overall: too much bla bla? .. can we have some more concrete examples for the impact? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For information ============ - Estimate of financial volume performed resulting in 4.6 Meuros which is within the given framework ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Schedule 5-6.9 - Meeting of editing team at NIKHEF 7.9. - Next phone meeting at 15:00 15.9 - Document complete 17.9-20.9 - Internal evaluation against guidelines (Joachim Mnich) - Language check (Seamus Hegarty, David Plane) 21.9 - Document submission 25.9.(17:00) - ultimate deadline for submission