9–12 May 2006
Palais du Pharo, Marseille
Europe/Zurich timezone

Reevaluation of MR Spectroscopy for the Coming Molecular Imaging

12 May 2006, 09:00
15m
Palais du Pharo, Marseille

Palais du Pharo, Marseille

oral S9_S10 Molecular Imaging Molecular Imaging

Speaker

Dr Keiko Imamura (Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine)

Description

Regarding that new molecular imaging technologies mostly emerge from isotopic imaging, it is important to reevaluate preceding technologies of other modalities and their current role in clinical medicine in order to understand what we presently know and what are needed. Among many modalities, MR spectroscopy (MRS) should be reemphasized because it is a robust in-vivo technique which can detect intrinsic metabolite molecules in living tissues and evaluate their concentrations. Proton (1H) and phosphorus (31P) MRS are applied to patients using clinical high-field (higher than or equal to 1.5T) MR units. Detectable metabolites by MRS are those related to the energy and membrane metabolism, organ-specific functions, or fermentation processes, such as ATP, (phospho)creatine, lactate, (phospho)choline, (phospho)ethanolamine, n-acetyl aspartate in the brain, citrate in the prostate, amino acids, lipids, etc. Metabolite signals are obtained from the defined region-of-interest in the tissue using a sophisticated signal localization MR sequence. Measurement time is usually several minutes in 1H MRS and 30 minutes in 31P MRS for a patient. Analysis of signal intensities of metabolites in MR spectra is helpful for diagnosis of diseases, like tumors, inflammation, infection and degenerative diseases. Especially, treatment follow-up of patients is the another area of application of MRS. Viability of cancer cells can be estimated based on signal intensities of ATP and phosphocholine/phosphoethanolamine in a 31P MR spectrum; the former is a measure of energy activity and the latter membrane turnover or cell proliferation rate. Therefore, MRS provides a biochemical evaluation of treatment effect of cancers, which otherwise can hardly be known. Although reduction in tumor size is accepted as an indicator of an effective treatment, discrepancy is sometimes observed between morphological evaluation and biochemical one; MRS suggests still a high viability of cells in the reduced residual tumor. Further treatment or change of therapeutic regimen are needed for those cases. Our experience will be presented. As conclusions, reevaluation of MRS might accurately present needs for the emerging new molecular imaging because MRS is the only available technique which provides in-vivo biochemical information in clinical medicine.

Author

Dr Keiko Imamura (Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine)

Co-authors

Dr Hisaya Nakajima (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine) Prof. Yasuo Nakajima (Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine) Dr Yuko Kobashi (Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.