Raised by Andrew
1. When will sites be requested to upgrade to 3.3.3? I had been expecting this to be fairly important, in particular for ATLAS, as it fixes the duplicate transfers problem AFAIK.
2. Do we really need to keep transfers in the backup tables 'indefinitely'? Does anyone actually use this? It results in the size of the database being very, very big, and constantly getting bigger and bigger...
3. Are any sites using a load-balancer instead of round-robin DNS in front of the FTS3 servers? I intend to move to using a pair of machines using HAProxy + Keepalived. HAProxy will be running health-checks on each FTS3 server so that dead or broken nodes will no longer be accessible by clients - that way we will be able to (finally) do transparent upgrades (!), or have an FTS3 server or two die overnight without anyone having to be woken up by a pager. It's also a first step in being able to eventually move to a more dynamic infrastructure.