Focus on:  Hide Contributions
Login

LHC QPS Review Committee

24–26 Feb 2009
CERN
Europe/Zurich timezone

Contribution List

24 / 24
7. How all the systems are working together (30’+15') (Powering interlocks for the LHC)
Markus Zerlauth
24/02/2009, 09:00
6. Summary of the 34 event (30’+15')
Pierre Strubin
24/02/2009, 09:45
8. Busbar joint stability (30’+15')
Arjan Verweij
24/02/2009, 10:45
9. Busbar quench protection enhancement (20’+10')
Knud Dahlerup-Petersen
24/02/2009, 11:30
10. Symmetric quench experience and planned solution (20’+10')
Reiner Denz
25/02/2009, 08:30
12. Are there any other superconducting busses not being monitored by a quench detection system: the diode area
Michael Koratzinos
25/02/2009, 09:00
13. Are there any other superconducting busses not being monitored by a quench detection system: 13kA & 6kA & 600A
Robert Henry Flora
25/02/2009, 09:15
15. Mechanical details of the bypass diodes
Knud Dahlerup-Petersen
25/02/2009, 09:40
16. How were the diodes tested prior to installation
Andrzej Siemko
25/02/2009, 09:55
17. Stresses on diode joints
Knud Dahlerup-Petersen
25/02/2009, 10:10
20. Effects of standard component failures as well as radiation damage on the operation of the QPS (fail safe or not). What design features make the system fail safe? Details on the detection circuits.
Reiner Denz
25/02/2009, 10:50
19. What limits the maximum negative di/dt for the magnet systems
Hugues Thiesen
25/02/2009, 11:20
32. Which experiences have been gained from the accident with respect to the expected behaviour of the existing QPS. Did everything react as designed? Did quenches propagate along the magnet chain due to transients and sudden current changes?
Sandrine Le Naour
25/02/2009, 11:40
22. MI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed. Time budgets for detection and energy extraction for the various magnet system.
Andrzej Siemko
25/02/2009, 12:10
24. Description of energy extraction components and design criteria
Knud Dahlerup-Petersen
25/02/2009, 14:00
27. How does electromagnetic noise (from environment and beam) affect the novel protection circuits for bus bar splices?
Robert Henry Flora
25/02/2009, 14:15
33. Reserve
25/02/2009, 14:30
34. Procedures used and the resulting traveler associated with the failed busbar joint. Ultrasound tests of joints.
Paolo Fessia
25/02/2009, 14:45
35. Stresses on busbar joints.
Paolo Fessia
25/02/2009, 15:00
36. QPS commissioning plan. Quality assurance during the installation of the new quench detection systems.
Fabio Formenti
25/02/2009, 15:15
28. Schedule foreseen for the completion of the new Enhanced QPS system
Fabio Formenti
25/02/2009, 15:30
30. How does standard component failure effect the operation of the QPS? In particular, what will happen in case of a mains power loss? Does the system rely on the proper functioning of a UPS system? Is the redundancy system properly designed on all levels?
Knud Dahlerup-Petersen
25/02/2009, 15:50
37. Reserve
25/02/2009, 16:30
38. Summary and preliminary recommendations
Jay Theilacker
26/02/2009, 15:00

Back to the event

Powered by Indico v3.3.4-pre