Operations Room: EVO <ol> <li>Critical kernel security bug</li> All sites monitored reported as OK by security. <li>Status and improvements in release testing in PPS</li> Early adopters idea? Is that progressing? Could we move some sites to "early adopters"? WCSS-PPS is moving to early adopter site. GUP-CERTIF-TB stays as is. SiGNET? <li>Downtimes</li> Sites should plan the maintenance in advance and set Scheduled downtimes instead of Unscheduled. Please remember about meaningful downtime description - then explanation about low availability is simpler. <li>Top level BDII service</li> <a href="http://zeus16.cyf-kr.edu.pl/cs-dynamic/bdii-status"> Status of the DNS pool </a><br> <a href="http://zeus16.cyf-kr.edu.pl/cs-dynamic/bdii-comp"> Differences between BDIIs </a><br> AT - having temporary outages - removed from the pool, observed in smokeping from CYFRONET, visible also in GSTAT http://egee017.cnaf.infn.it/gstat/HEPHY-UIBK/ - to be investigagted<br> CZ - not requested to get back to the pool although seems like fixed<br> Recent fixes announced by Laurence - size limit, cacheing. Done at all top BDII according to Lukasz F. <br> <li>HEPSPEC accepted (as a result of voting)</li> <a href="https://edms.cern.ch/file/923879/1/SA1_Coord_Meeting_Minutes_2009-11-17.pdf">Minutes from the last SA1 Coordination meeting</a> <br> <li>Cream CE as critical service</li> Tests results are available in SAM production instance, but without history.<br> <a href="https://lcg-sam-val.cern.ch:8443/sam/sam.py">Cream CE status in SAM validation instance (with history)</a> <br> </ol>

1st line support

• Jan Astalos

Room: EVO

Monitoring

• Emir Imamagic (SRCE)

Room: EVO

AOB Room: EVO