Project Roadmapping Task Force 3
Present: Miguel Mendes, Thijs Wijnands,
Chair: Paula Martinez Urios
Minutes: Jenni Kaipainen
Agenda & Minutes
Going through the slides that Paula and Miguel prepared.
Points rised in discussion:
- A bit of study phase is included too
- There is always a pain, need and desire
- Think before you do. Who sponsors and how the money is guaranteed for the whole duration of the project.
- Proposal for HL-LHC design study still to be found
- LHC is a project of projects = program where each of the work pachages is an individual project
- Thijs: "Can you come up with a pool of things that you consider good?"
- We are having a lot of examples, but are they any good?
- Make it coherent between the booklet and the slides; eg. executive summary is missing from the booklet
- new items to the standards, such as primary breakdown,
- Nowadays Cost, Scope & Time --> Value, Quality& Image/ reputation
- take into account stakeholders; in CERN's case competitiors are other labs and research center; It is always a question of "why did you choose to do otherwise?"
- define your benefit, and that shall be the aimed impact of the project
- Risks are positive of negative impacts. There are known risks, unknown risks (contingency), unknown unknown risks
- how are you measuring the benefits/ achieving the goals?
- PMI standard for program management
- "how the decisions are going to be taken - something missing in project proposals in general?" - paula
Next steps:
- benefits management plan
- remarks paula wrote down to her
-
There are minutes attached to this event.
Show them.
