a) Actions foreseen during LS2 and present status (switch consolidation, grounding)
b) additional MKBs or other solutions to be investigated (separate vacuum tank) with technical details.
When possible applying first mitigations? Latest date to start production.
a) Upgrade foreseen during LS2 (MKB re-triggering, IPOC upgrade, sparking surveillance, etc.)
b) Actions foreseen for LS3 (what is in the baseline: Triggering synchronization distribution, powering etc.)
c) What is not in the baseline and might be needed (replacement of aging equipment, etc. consolidation? Operational budget?)
a) Review of existing design, design choices, etc.
b) Operation during run II: vibrations, leaks.
C) actions foreseen during LS2 and actions from the past (N2 bottle on surface, design and construction of new back windows, decision on gaskets, etc..) .
a) worst accidental design scenario known until and post RunII, worst design accidental scenario for the future.
b) Run III operational scenarios.
How we study the problem, why the windows are an issue, why the core might be an issue, what are the missing information in terms of properties, what is the dominating problem, severity of different failure scenarios on the core, etc…
Material properties needed to assess the core performances, tests done @ CERN, tests to be done outside.
a) current collaboration and activities for further decision (core, windows)
b) plan for the future and possible options.
c) decision points and how we decide.
d) problems to be solved and how we would proceed (new gaskets, new core, damping system, eventual staged upgrade during run III).