112th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting

Europe/Zurich
6/R-012 - conference room (CERN)

6/R-012 - conference room

CERN

40
Show room on map

Tentative results of the discussion (summarized by KO):

1. The distance between ee and HH IPs. A solution may exist for the ee-optics as presented by KO, shifting the HH beam looks easier and even cheaper than moving the ee beam. One of our HH colleagues (Rogelio) thinks that the best way is to extend the HH beam from the arc following the outer beam of ee (blue line in the left side of the slide) until HH IP comes close to ee's. So we will wait for the developments in the HH side, before looking at the ee lattice further.

2. The difficulties of 4 IP to achieve the peak and integrated luminosity, such as pointed out by Dmitry, are well recognized by people in the meeting. The 4 IP issue needs a discussion with physics people. 

3. The alignment strategy based on girders in the arc, a as in the slides, sounds more or less reasonable to the participants of the meeting. There may be some misunderstandings between the alignment people. So having a joint meeting with optics and alignment people will be good to solve the issue. Some external experts may be invited too.

 

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.
    • 09:00 09:20
      Making the IP close to HH's (very preliminary). 20m

      It is desired to shift ee's IP toward HH's as much as possible. A trial will be shown. Difficulties are the increase of emittance due to additional dipoles.

      Speaker: Dr Katsunobu Oide (High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JP))
    • 09:20 09:40
      Some issues with tracking: MADX vs. Lifetrac (continued) 20m
      Speaker: Dmitry Shatilov (Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (RU))
    • 09:40 10:00
      First Attempts of Tapering in MADX 20m
      Speaker: Leon Van Riesen-Haupt (CERN)