Go to the Indico Home Page Oldest event Older event Up to category Newer event Newest event Printable version
  • Compact style
  • Indico style
  • Indico style - inline minutes
  • Indico style - numbered
  • Indico style - numbered + minutes
  • Indico Weeks View
    • Switch to the management area of this event
    Login

    sFGD beam test analysis

    → Europe/Zurich
    Description

    https://fnal.zoom.us/j/257160569

      • 16:00 → 16:20
        LANL analysis status report 20m
        Speaker: Guang Yang (Stony Brook University)
        LANL_Jul28_2020_gyang.pdf
      • 16:20 → 16:40
        Wrap-around update 20m
        Speaker: Shih-Kai Lin (Louisiana State University)
        20200729_wrap-around.pdf
      • 16:40 → 17:00
        Charge cut study 20m
        Speaker: Wilf Shorrock (Imperial College (GB))
        WilfS_29Jul20_LANLCuts.pdf
      • 17:00 → 17:20
        Comparison of 0 and 180 configurations 20m
        Speaker: Ms Andriaseta Sitraka (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology)
      • 17:20 → 17:35
        CERN beam test analysis update 15m
        Speaker: Wilf Shorrock (Imperial College (GB))
      • 17:35 → 17:45
        CERN beam test paper 10m
      • 17:45 → 17:50
        Meeting Minutes 5m
        Speaker: Ciro Riccio (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II e INFN sezione di Napoli (IT))
        Attendees: Guang Yang (GY), Ciro Riccio (CR), Shih-Kai Lin (SKL), Abraham Teklu (AT), Eric Chong (EC), Dana Douqa (DD), Perri Zilberman (PZ), David Last (DL), Clark McGrew (CMG), Andriaseta Sitraka (AS), César Jesús-Valls (CJV), Martin Tzavoz (MT), Chang Kee Jung (CKJ), Wilf Shorrock (WS), Vittorio Paolone (VP), David Martinez Caicedo (DMC), Etam Noah (EN), Cristopher Mauger (CM)
         
        LANL neutron test beam:
         
          • MCG: By multi-track do you mean multi-track from the same vertex? GY: Yes.
          • CKJ: Detector is not uniform along z because we do not have the same MPPC everywhere. Also neutron elastic scattering would be a problem. GY: Yes, we should rely on the MC for that. 
          • CKJ: We should have as primary goal the understanding of the response of the detector. 
          • GY: Not sure about the air gap value. CKJ: We should know the dimension of the detector. These numbers should be in the CERN TB paper? EN: No, actually. GY: I will use as default geometry the one without air gap
          • CMG: Can we have a GitHub group as we did in CAPTAIN? GY: Yes, this is the idea. CR: We have already a GitLab project where we have a package where Guang will push all his code.
          • CM: slide 5: Is there some angle dependence here? CKJ: FV should be very very tight and we must understand how the angular dependence has an impact. GY: Full talk by Perri next week on this topic. 
          • CM: slide 6: the plots are MC or data? GY: Both are MC. 
          • CMG: slide 6: You are probably introducing some bias using the +-1 tick cut. GY: I am giving this talk because we need feedback on these topics. The voxelization is something we should look over again to check the results with a better MC. 
          • CM: The pion/proton samples? Will you distribute isotropically such events? Yes, starting from the geometric center of the detector. 
          • CKJ: Do you want to specify the angle? GY: We need the angle w.r.t. beam direction. 
          • DL: 180 degree we observe hot channels induced by beam.
          • CKJ: How many events have single track? GY: I have a MC estimation. For low energy the one track is dominant, while for higher we observe more multi-track events. 
         
        • Shih-Kai Lin - Wrap-around update
          • DL: Do you confirm that the peaks are micropulse times apart aka 1.778877us or whatever (715/716) ticks apart . SKL: Yes, I confirm it.
          • GY: David, you told me that we are missing 4 hits and not just the first, right? DL: It was a rudimentary check. We should rely on this study since it is more accurate. 
          • SKL: Are people suggesting to look macropulse per macropulse? GY: Yes. 
          • CKJ: slide 10: we can ask beam scientist at LANL to confirm that.
          • CKJ: Why we have duplication? GY: if we lift the dt cut, within every trig time (10 microsecond), all hit will be associated with possible t0 trigger, which means one hit will be repeated for 5-6 times.
          • SKL: Is there a better way to look at multiple counting? DL: We can discuss offline.
         
        • Wilf Shorrock - Charge cut study
          • GY: I will give you an updated version of the MC but this should not change the results you are showing here.

         

        • Comparison of 0 and 180 configurations - Andriaseta Sitraka
          • Postponed to the next meeting