A review of the experimental results (mainly from CMS and ATLAS, but not only) on signatures with non-SM final states.
With focus on phase-2, what improvements could we expect thanks to the new trigger system and new detectors
The plans for the 40 MHz scouting system during Run 3, its ultimate design and limitations.
Technical description of the current infrastructure, both hardware and software. Path towards the ultimate implementation for Run3.
The data we are gathering, its quality and features. Their usage as tool for monitoring and studying the L1 system.
The data we are gathering, its quality and features. Their usage as tool for monitoring and studying the L1 system.
Using machine learning to re-calibrate and classify L1 objects for improved online analysis potential. Implementation in FPGA with flexible high-level tools
Phase 2 electronics being developed for the DT chambers allows reading out at 40 MHz the whole full-resolution detector data. The past and the current sector test at CMS is going to be presented as well as the next steps and possible developments.
Are there physics measurement that can be performed with the legacy L1 trigger information?
A review of models whose signatures either could have escaped if not purposefully searched for or which due to the current way data are managed/processed/analyzed we have little sensitivity for
How the scouting could be used to monitor the Luminosity, which source is best suited, the biases that could affect the measurements.
Review of the expected performances of the Phase II L1 trigger reconstruction and L1 Physics Menu. How close the L1 reconstruction will it be to the offline one, and which physics potentials can have a 40 MHz scouting system with respect to the L1 Physics Menu
How the current infrastructure will evolve and what its main figures will be.
Overview of the HLT scouting, the current infrastructure, the results obtained so far and those expected in the future. What are the main limitations and solutions to overcome them?
Solutions should be found on how to manage and process the amount of scouting data. How shall the online analysis be organized? What shall be left for offline?
Triggerless data acquisition allows a partial removal of the biases with which we search for NP; 40 MHz scouting is a suitable place where to employ anomaly detection techniques (a.k.a. model-independent analysis). How shall that be practically organized? Can it be run online?
How the physics potential of the experiment will benefit from a scouting system. A few examples and comparisons.
Summary discussion. Definition of the to-do list and next steps
