Speaker
Description
Octupole correlations near $N = Z = 56$ are unique in sense that they occur between particles in the same orbitals for both neutrons and protons. In this region just above $^{100}$Sn, it is expected that enhanced octupole correlations will take place at low and medium spins in the light Te ($Z = 52$), I ($Z = 53$) and Xe ($Z = 54$) nuclei [1]. In this region of the nuclear chart, the Fermi surface for both neutrons and protons lies close to orbitals from the $d_{5/2}$ and $h_{11/2}$ subshells; octupole correlations emerge from the interactions of particles in these orbitals with valence neutrons and protons outside the $^{100}$Sn core [2, 3]. As a result of the octupole correlations, an enhancement of octupole collectivity is expected to appear. Close to N = Z = 56, a level structure characteristic of octupole correlations, consisting of negative-parity states and enhanced E1 transitions, has been observed in a number of cases including $^{112}$Xe [4], $^{114}$Xe [5, 6, 7] and $^{118}$Ba [8].
With the aim to observe for the first time the octupole band in the neutron-deficient ($N = Z + 2$) $^{110}$Xe nucleus, an in-beam experiment was performed at the Accelerator Laboratory of the University of Jyv\”askyl\”a, Finland. The $^{110}$Xe nuclei were produced via the $^{54}$Fe($^{58}$Ni,2n) fusion-evaporation reaction. The emitted $\gamma$ rays were detected using the JUROGAM3 $\gamma$-ray spectrometer [9], while the fusion-evaporation residues were separated with the MARA separator [10]. In this experiment, we were able to prove the existence of the octupole band via the identification of the low-lying 3$^{-}$ and 5$^{-}$ states and the inter-band E1 transitions between the ground-state band and the octupole band. These new experimental data combined with a discussion using state-of-the-art theoretical calculations will be presented.
[1] G. de Angelis et al., Phys. Lett. B 437 (1998) 236.
[2] P.A. Butler and W. Nazarewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 349.
[3] L.M. Robledo and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011), 054302.
[4] J.F. Smith et al. Phys. Lett. 523 B, 13 (2001).
[5] S.L. Rugari et al. Phys. Rev. C 48, 2078 (1993).
[6] E.S. Paul et al., Nucl. Phys. A673, 31 (2000).
[7] G. de Angelis et al., Phys. Lett. B 535 (2002) 93.
[8] J.F. Smith et al., Phys.Rev. C5 7, R1037-R1041 (1998).
[9] J. Pakarinen et al., Eur.Phys. J. A 56 (2020) 150.
[10] J. Sar\’en et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 266 (2008) 4196-4200.
