HL-LHC BGI - Mechanial design review
Meeting minutes
Attendees
- William Andreazza
- Chiara Pasquino
- Gunn Khatri
- Marc Mclean
- Maria Teresa Garcia Ramos
- James Storey
Last Actions Review
Talking Points
- Mechanical design review (T. Ramos)
- Different options discussion (All)
Minutes of the discussion
- A magnetic field of 0.5 T is the minimum required to achieve less than 5% precision error in the measurements.
- It is crucial that the transverse component of the magnetic field is close to 0.
- Option 3, the "Rectangular flange," seems the most optimal in terms of flexibility concerning TPX3 or TPX4 integration.
- Additionally, RF impedance studies appear to be the most promising.
- The envelope considering the TPX4 option is larger than that of the TPX3.
- For the design of the main magnet, we agree to set a 180 mm aperture.
- TPX3 is not currently operational in SPS due to interferences preventing communication with the chip.
- TPX4 has not yet been tested.
- Two options have been proposed to consolidate TPX3:
1. Test the SPS-BGI tank in EMI to replicate the environment where the detectors are installed and resolve communication issues.
2. Install an SPS-BGI tank adapted to the LHC layout in the next YETS 24-25:
Discuss with the workshop the feasibility of producing a tank for YETS 24-25.
Discuss with the impedance group the integration of the SPS-BGI tank into the LHC layout at the location where the old LHC-BGI is installed.
Conduct a vacuum acceptance test of the SPS-BGI components (Staystik).
Action Items
|
Action |
Responsible |
|
· Discuss with the workshop the feasibility of producing a tank for this YETS 24-25 |
ML |
|
· Discuss with impedance group the integration of SPS-BGI tank into LHC layout at the location when the old LHC-BGI are installed |
ML |
|
· Vacuum acceptance test of the SPS-BGI components (Staystik) o Order Staystik o Vacuum acceptance test process completion |
XEI ML |
|
· Contact EMI to perform an electromagnetic interaction study to test the electronics |
XEI |